Sunday, January 20, 2019

The USA, a Country Built upon Genocide and Slavery

Before I commence this article I wish to point out to my very many readers from the USA that this is not intended to be a personal criticism but a general observation and analysis of the United States as a country and the basis on which it was founded and it should be considered in that light.

I find it ironic that a country whose presidents claim to be the 'leaders of the Free World' should be able to do so unchallenged time after time without anyone taking the time to query this supremely arrogant assumption. The term 'Free World' has its origins in the 'Cold War' (the first Cold War as we are now once again plunged in to a new one thanks to the USA). I am not going to discuss this term in any great detail today except to state that it applied originally to the non-Communist world although it has a more general application today. Sometimes as an alternative the 'leaders of the Western World' is used which obviously has a slightly different connotation and emphasis.

It should be remembered that during the first Cold War (1946-1991) there were many countries that did not align themselves with either the USA or the USSR and remained independent of their spheres of influence. Also apart from NATO there never was any kind of formal alliance between the USA and the 'Free World'. Whilst on the subject of NATO I should point out that three of its member States-Turkey, Portugal and Greece were at one time dictatorships whilst members of NATO; therefore so much for the concept of the 'Free World'!

Sometimes the term 'International Community' is used as an alternative to 'Free World' which once again the USA appears to make itself the leader of. Often when commentators talk of 'defying the International Community' they are really meaning 'defying the will of the government of the United States'. This imperious attitude and imperialistic policy effectively makes the USA a despot on the international stage. When it is not threatening countries with nuclear annihilation (North Korea) or general warfare (Syria, Iran, China, Russia) it uses its economic muscle to bully independent and sovereign States with 'sanctions' to enforce its selfish will upon the world, even going so far as to making its policy on sanctions a form of international law! The arrogance is stunningly breath taking. A country which has set itself up as the sole arbiter of who gets to join the 'nuclear club' and yet is the only State in history to have used nuclear weapons in warfare when it unleashed two devastating atomic bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1945, a war crime for which it has gone unpunished. Whilst it falsely accuses Iran of attempting to construct a nuclear weapon it buries its head in the sand and denies that its puppet master Israel has any such weapons. The State of Israel itself never publicly admits to nor denies having nuclear weapons which in itself is an admission that it has. The United Kingdom has been complicit in helping Israel to build a nuclear arsenal. In the 1950s and 1960s the United Kingdom shipped uranium-235 (1959) and plutonium (1966) to this rogue State. Let us not forget also that the apartheid State of Israel would not exist if it were not for the British Balfour Declaration of 1917.

This American arrogance is bolstered by the concept of 'American exceptionalism', a term which was first coined by Joseph Stalin in reference to those American Communists who argued that the USA was so different that certain aspects of Marxist economic theory should not apply to that country. Since then the term has been used by American presidents from Ronald Reagan onwards, including the Obama and Trump administrations. It has taken on a slightly different meaning and the concept (not the term) may be traced back to the American Revolution and the development of the idea of 'Americanism' which embraces the false ideals of 'liberty', 'egalitarianism', 'individualism', 'republicanism', 'democracy' and 'capitalism'; a most odious concoction which makes the USA the embodiment of everything that I detest. It would not have been so bad if it had kept these ideas to itself but for hundreds of years it has sought to force its false and repugnant 'ideals' upon the rest of the world either by force of arms or sanctions which can be nearly as deadly as bullets and bombs.

In April 2018 the rather overweight and overfed Secretary of State Michael Pompeo (note the similarity between his surname and the adjective 'pompous'!) stated that the USA "is a unique, exceptional country. Russia is unique, but not exceptional." This is not only sheer pompous arrogance but an incredible stupid and UNDIPLOMATIC remark to make by the USA's most senior 'diplomat'!

The only 'exceptional' thing that the USA brings to mind apart from being the world's first and thus far only unpunished nuclear war criminal rogue State is the fact that it is the only modern State to be founded in the modern era upon genocide. As I have pointed out before, Karma or to use the Listian term Garma affects not only individuals but nation States and that includes the USA. A country that was founded upon the theft of Red Indian tribal lands and the genocide of its tribes after just 200 years is facing its own genocide, or at least its founding northern European population is. The non-Hispanic European-American population slipped to just 60.7% of the total US population in 2017. (US Census Bureau) This percentage will steadily decrease and eventually they will become a racial minority within the country which they founded. The cause of this is two-fold. Firstly we are seeing the Karmic effects of the crimes of the European settlers with their genocidal conquest of North America being visited upon their descendants and secondly we see the Karmic effects of the multiracial society which the American based New World Order forced upon western Europe again being visited upon the Europid North American population. What a pity that the indigenous tribes had not built a 'wall' 500 years ago to keep the invaders out!

Closely associated with 'American exceptionalism' is the 19th century concept of 'Manifest Destiny' which regarded the invading settlers and their descendants as having special virtues and a 'God'-granted right to expand all across North America to the detriment of its indigenous population. This lunatic thinking is all the product of the peculiar form of Christianity which these invaders had imported with them.

In addition to the genocidal founding of the USA we also have the fact that its economy was built upon African slavery. Is it any wonder that the USA has a racial problem when the descendants of these slaves who are generally treated less favourably than other racial groups in the USA are filled with anger, bitterness and resentment towards the descendants of their slave masters-all understandable emotions. So call it what you will-there may even be an element of what the Germans call Schadenfreude in my articles regarding the USA but I feel no sympathy or empathy for the fate of these people. This is especially so when I viewed with great sadness today a short video of an elderly Red Indian Vietnam veteran, aged 64 being ridiculed by a bunch of mainly white and Roman Catholic anti-abortion protesting, 'Make America Great Again' cap wearing youths, one of whom invaded the man's personal space and stared at him in an impudent fashion. I am not a violent man but I would in that circumstance have been prompted to have taught that idiotic youth a lesson in manners and it would have been an extremely short lesson at that. There has been a great deal of coverage of this outrageous incident in the media. Here is a link which takes you to a video of this disgraceful act:

A note to my English readers, racist attitudes by white American Christians are not at all unusual in the USA which although not constitutionally Christian is still largely infected by what I have termed the Pilgrim Fathers' Complex. See my earlier articles: USA, Israel and the Pilgrim Fathers Complex and American Circumcision: An Indication of its Biblical Psychosis and the Pilgrim Fathers' Complex One sees for instance many 'white nationalists' who claim to be 'Christian' espousing the most vile views regarding other races. One American 'Christian' in particular posting on the almost dead Skadi forum described African-Americans as 'livestock'. So the USA has more than its fair share of knuckle draggers and many if not most of them define themselves as 'Christian', making a mockery of that religion and hypocrites of themselves.

Friday, January 18, 2019

Brexit-the Betrayal of the People by the Political Elite

I am a regular viewer of the BBC Parliament channel and a reader of the online Hansard which records the daily proceedings of both the House of Commons and the House of Lords and this has given me an in depth insight into the workings of Parliament and the political machinations of both the United Kingdom's elected representatives and the unelected lords, both temporal and spiritual. My readers may note that I have deliberately placed representatives and lords in italics for many if not most of these representatives do anything but represent the wishes and will of their electorate but pursue their own globalist agenda as slaves of the New World Order. Likewise these lords also do everything in their power to subvert democracy and thwart the will of the people and they do so with greater temerity for they know that they can act with impunity as they, unlike MPs are not accountable to the electorate. It is surely an anachronism that 26 bishops of the Church of England should be permitted to propose or vote on legislation affecting the United Kingdom when the said Church and indeed Christianity as a whole is now a minority religion both in England and the United Kingdom! It should be noted that just as modern day knights generally lack horse riding and jousting skills many of the so-called lords lack any known aristocratic ancestry.

It is clear from both opinion polls and the opinions expressed by both MPs and lords that the vast majority are not in favour of the United Kingdom's exit from the European Union (incorrectly called 'Brexit'. For the benefit of my foreign readers the United Kingdom is greater than just the island of Britain). Those that do support 'Brexit' do so only with reservations and the prerequisite of having a trade deal. This flies straight in the face of the electorate who voted to leave the European Union. The ballot paper did not mention anything about having a 'trade deal'! The question on the ballot paper was very simple and succinct: "Should the United Kingdom remain a member of the European Union or leave the European Union?" The available answers to choose from were "Remain a member of the European Union" and "Leave the European Union." By stipulating that the United Kingdom should not leave the European Union without a trade deal they are in effect denying the express will of the electorate and adding their own precondition, a precondition which did NOT exist on the aforementioned ballot paper!

Many MPs state that the United Kingdom should leave the European Union but remain as a member of the customs union. This is either an indicator of the sheer ignorance of these MPs or it is a deliberate ruse to keep this country within the European Union in all but name (and without voting rights!) for the European Union IS a customs union and has been so since 1957 with the passing of the Treaty of Rome and the creation of the European Economic Community which at that time consisted of just Belgium, France, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands and the Federal Republic of Germany (West Germany). In 1967 the European Economic Community, the European Coal and Steel Community and the European Atomic Energy Community were combined into a single 'European Communities' via the 1965 Merger Treaty. The European Communities were enlarged in 1973 with the inclusion of Denmark, the United Kingdom and Ireland. Greenland although part of the Kingdom of Denmark actually left the Communities in 1985 due to a dispute over fishing rights. So the United Kingdom would not be the first country to have left this organisation! In 1975 a referendum was held in the United Kingdom over its membership of the Communities and a large majority voted to remain within it-67.23%. Greece joined in 1981 and Spain and Portugal in 1985. The Single European Act was signed in 1986, coming into effect in 1987, with the intention of creating a single market. In 1986 the European Flag came into use, giving the impression for the first time that the Communities were a Super State, albeit an embryonic one. The next significant step was the passing of the Maastricht Treat in 1992 which came into force in 1993 and created the European Union.  The terminology is important to note for the word 'Union' implies a kind of State such as the United Kingdom which was formed by Acts of Union in the 18th and 19th centuries. Now the European Union had a remit not just in economics but in the fields of foreign policy and justice. In 1995 Austria, Finland and Sweden joined the European Union.

The next major development in the European Union occurred in 2002 with the replacement of national currencies in 12 member States with the infamous 'Euro'. These countries collectively became known as the 'Eurozone' and now numbers 19 out of the current 28 member States. This currency is controlled by the European Central Bank. By adopting the Euro the countries within the Eurozone have surrendered their sovereignty in monetary policy to a foreign Central Bank. It is clear from history that a necessary step in political union and often an initial step is monetary union. The same thing happened in 1989 with the collapse of the German Democratic Republic (East Germany). Prior to political union with the Federal Republic on 3rd October 1990 the Democratic Republic adopted the Deutsche Mark on 1st July 1990. Indeed I was present in the Democratic Republic literally on the eve of currency union.

In 2004 a further and very extensive enlargement of the European Union occurred with the entry of Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Slovakia and Slovenia. In 2007 Bulgaria and Romania became members. In 2009 the Lisbon Treaty of 2007 gave a legal personality to the European Union.

The European Parliament has its origins in the Common Assembly of the European Coal and Steel Community in 1952 and was initially just a consultative body. Its members did not become electable until 1979. Like the Euro and the European Flag the European Parliament gives to the European Union the appearance of a Super State. It must be remembered that European law overrides English law and the laws of any other member States. This effectively transforms national parliaments into glorified council chambers!

Like any other Super State the European Union also has a defence policy, called the Common Security and Defence Policy. Strangely although the European Union does not (yet) have an army it never the less has a Director General of the European Union Military Staff! This position was created in 2001 and is occupied by a real General. The formation of a European Army will be the final step in the creation of the European Super State.

Like any other Super State the European Union has a legal framework with courts. The European Court of Justice was established as long ago as 1952 by the 1951 Treaty of Paris and is the supreme court of the European Union, deciding on matters of European law. The European Court of Human Rights has a much wider jurisdiction as it has 47 member States and was established in 1959 by the European Convention on Human Rights. The aforesaid member States are members of the Council of Europe which was formed in 1949 and is often confused with the European Union. They are distinctly separate organisations but it also uses the European Flag and indeed created the said flag in 1955!

As previously mentioned the European Union is a customs union and indeed it is part of the European Union Customs Union which consists not only of the member States of the European Union but Monaco and also Akrotir and Dhekelia which is a British military base in Cyprus and the United Kingdom Dependencies of Guernsey, the Isle of Man and Jersey. The European Union is also in a customs union with Andorra, San Marino and Turkey.

Distinct from the customs union is the European Single Market which consists of the European Union, Iceland Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland. Many MPs propose that the United Kingdom on leaving the European Union should remain members of either the customs union and/or the single market. However to remain in the single market the United Kingdom would be required to submit to the 'four freedoms'-the free movement of goods, the free movement of capital, the freedom to establish and provide services and crucially the free movement of people. Immigration and the taking of jobs by foreign nationals were two of the reasons why most people voted to leave the European Union so once again our elected representatives are betraying the will of the people! The negotiators of the European Union have stated many times that they are not willing to negotiate on the aforesaid 'freedoms'.

It is clear that those who have (like myself) voted in favour of leaving the European Union are going to be betrayed over the coming months by the globalists in both of the Houses of Parliament. It is often remarked by 'remoaners' that the result of the referendum was a close one with 51.89% against 48.11% and that in  Scotland the electorate voted to remain (62% opposed to 38%) as did Northern Ireland (55.78% opposed to 44.22%) but in England 53.38% voted to leave as opposed to 46.62% and in Wales 52.53% voted to leave as opposed to 47.47%. Indeed the largest percentage turnout of voters was in England at 73% and Wales at 71.7%. By comparison the turnout in Scotland was less at 67.2% and in Northern Ireland it was only 62.7%. It should also be considered that England is the largest constituent country in the United Kingdom with 39,005,71 voters (including Gibraltar), followed by Scotland (3,987,112), Wales (2,270,272) and Northern Ireland (1,260,955).

The turnout for the referendum was the highest for any referendum in the United Kingdom and the highest for any national vote since the 1992 General Election so the issue of membership of the United Kingdom in the European Union is one that many people feel passionately about. It is rare for the masses to be so engaged politically. Thus if they are betrayed by Parliament this will have negative repercussions for parliamentary 'democracy', especially in England. It will demonstrate clearly to all what a sham 'democracy' really is. If the people feel betrayed by the political elite then this will light the touch paper for mass protests, potentially violent ones at that and who knows what will happen then?

Wednesday, January 16, 2019

Some Comments on Beards

What sparked off this article was my discovery of an interesting court case from one year ago concerning a decision made by the Administrative Appeals Court of Versailles in France. A medical student of the University of Menoufia in Egypt became an intern at the Sant-Dennis Medical Centre in 2014 in France. He was dismissed after 4 months after failing to comply with repeated management requests to trim his beard. The court documents indicated that the hospital feared that his beard was "perceived by staff members as a sign of religious affiliation". Apparently in the atheistic State of France secularism is the new religion and displaying affiliation towards one's own religion in the work place is frowned upon. Since 2010 any kind of face covering in public has been banned in France. No doubt this measure was introduced in order to alienate France's Muslim population. Whilst it must have been clear to the intern's colleagues that the Egyptian was in all likelihood a Muslim by virtue of his nationality never the less any public perception of this was insanely regarded as a breach of his contract. The court found that the termination of his contract was "legally justified."  See

This case raises the question of adherents of heathenism being discrimated against as beards are also an indicator of heathen affiliation, especially so in the Northern Tradition. In fact as his lawyer indicated her client could just as easily have been a 'hipster', making a nonsense out of the court's judgement. The law banning face coverings in France was introduced by former President Nicolas Sarkozy, whose mother was the daughter of a Greek Jew. Make of that what you will! Apparently Sarkozy's maternal grand uncle Moshe Mallah was a rabbi and a devoted Zionist. The Zionist antipathy towards Islam is a matter of record and this is seen to a much greater extent on the European continent than in the United Kingdom.

The populist and anti-Islamic Danish Peoples Party have argued that physicians sporting full beards should not be allowed to practise in Danish hospitals. It raises the question as to whether the author of this ridiculous policy has thought through the ramifications of this in relation to non-Muslims such as Danish heathens. See In June 2018 Denmark introduced legislation to ban the wearing of a burqa and FAKE BEARDS! This ridiculous law gives the Police in this oppressive Christian country the ability to stop Muslims or indeed anyone with a full beard to check whether the beard is false or not! Needless to say this insane law was introduced primarily to harass Muslims but has a practical effect on other non-Christian minorities too such as heathens-or hipsters! Although Denmark is allegedly a secular country Christianity still has a grip upon the collective psyche of Danes. Despite church attendance in Denmark being a mere 5% children automatically become members of the church when baptised and this accounts for the very high and thus artificially inflated church membership rate of 75.9% in 2017, although this has sharply declined from 91.6% in 1984. However despite record numbers of people formally leaving the Church Christianity as a cultural matrix still has a grip on many Danes and is used by populist parties as a front in order to attack Islam. One sees this also in the United Kingdom with the Britain First Party. See

Leaving aside the paranoia that is being whipped up against Muslims I note that Gloucestershire Police in 2015 have insisted that their officers who have luxurious beards must wear beard hair nets, similar to those used in the food industry. See
How demeaning and emasculating is this discriminatory practise!

For no legitimate logical reason the director of the Belgian cycling team has banned members of his team from wearing a beard. See

It is well known that feminists hate beards and the men who wear them as the beard is the ultimate sign of masculinity and to these deranged harridans it represents the 'patriarchy'. Thus wearing a beard is to strike a blow against these men-haters. It is important that the beard is grown as long as possible. A beard that cannot be gripped by one's hand is not in my opinion a beard but mere stubble, a sign of the cosmopolitan latte drinking daily showering metrosexual.

A beard is also a demonstration of one's racial ancestry for many races and ethnicities are unable to grow beards. By comparison the northern European's ability to grow a full beard compared to other races is a matter of biological fact.

Beards are a rejection of Christianity. It is not for nothing that Christians in western Christendom were referred to as shavelings with their prohibitions in the Middle Ages against the growing of both hair and beards. This lack of heathen manliness was particularly prominent amongst the Norman invaders with their basin cut hairstyles and smooth chins. See Amongst cults such as Mormonism and the Jehovah's Witnesses the wearing of beards is frowned upon even today.

Saturday, January 12, 2019

Further Reflection on the Dire State of Nationalism

Over the last 5-6 weeks I have spent a considerable amount of time attempting to engage nationalists on several 'debate' forums regarding the following issues: the rejection of capitalism, the exposure of the Tel Aviv-Washington axis, the rejection of Christianity and a criticism of the concept of the nation State. On the rare occasions that I join a forum it is to liven things up to provoke discussion and indeed to be provocative for I have come to the conclusion that not only are the masses asleep but the so-called awakened ones are only half conscious themselves. I have come to the conclusion that forums such as Skadi and The Apricity are little more than tea clubs for people who like to socialise with others who appear to think exactly the same about politics and religion. When it comes to having to rationalise and elucidate their views they prefer instead to demonise the person asking the question. If these people cannot cope with a slight divergence of opinion how are they to cope in the real world with a  real enemy? They trivialise the concept of passionate debate by reducing it to discussion about safe trivia. Non-conformism is not tolerated.

Ignore the statistics where on Skadi it says that there are "11,060 users online" (at the time of typing this article). In reality there will be no more than a dozen at the most and that is when it is particularly busy! If there is any truth in the 11,060 figure then you can rest assured that 11,051 or the majority of that figure are actually spambots. Skadi appears to have a dreadful problem with this issue. More often than not I observed that a proportion of the 'members' on line were spambot accounts; sometimes accounting for as many as 50% of the online 'membership'. Practically every time I visited the forum I observed new spambots registering. Of course this has an effect of artificially inflating their statistics when in reality Skadi possibly attracts less views than this blog. (I know-I have analysed their statistics).

After a good 5 weeks or so of stirring up the dead I was inevitably banned although I may add that as they do not employ IP bans it is very simple to create a new account as long as you create a different profile. Most of the posters on Skadi are based in the United States-approximately 36% according to some analytical tools that I have used. After that Germany comes second at about 19%. However from my own observations I would estimate that more than half of the current active users are Americans. Many but not all of the more vociferous ones are 'Christian'. However genuine Christians do not advocate the carrying of guns, racial segregation or have a racist Weltanschauung. Neither are genuine Christians likely to ever post on nationalist or racialist Internet discussion forums. A genuine Christian seeks to emulate the life of Christ in thought, word and deed and not verbally abuse others and use profanity as I have observed not only on Skadi but amongst so-called Christian supporters of Paul Harris ('Tommy Robinson') on YouTube. Genuine Christians I can respect but I have nothing but contempt for these hypocrites and they bring shame to their religion.

Bearing in mind the high number of American posters on Skadi I fail to see how it can in all honesty be referred to as a website dedicated to the 'Preservation of Germanic heritage' as the majority of the so-called 'Germanic' posters from North America and other parts of the 'New World' will be hopelessly mixed ethnically even if they may identify themselves as being 'European'. Indeed despite Skadi's rule about members being predominately Germanic I have noted that quite a few members have anything but Germanic ancestry. Irish, French and Scottish ancestry is surely anything but Germanic in ethnicity? Much to my amusement the administration of Skadi regard Scotland and Northern Ireland as being parts of 'Germanic Europe' and have their own sub forums. Most Scots and Irish would be horrified at the suggestion that they were 'Germanic'. Let us not forget the deep enmity that many Scots have towards the English which is encapsulated in the term 'Sassenach', a word which derives from the Scottish Gaelic Sassunach from Late Latin Saxones (Saxons). Lowland Scots are also referred to by this term by Highland Scots as many Scottish people who have their origins close to the border between England and Scotland may have Anglo-Saxon ancestry. I was also appalled by the sheer naked racism exhibited by some of the posters, one American poster in particular referred to African Americans as 'livestock'. This knuckle dragging behaviour is rife in 'white nationalism', particularly so in the USA.

I also found it quite disturbing to see how the few genuine active European posters on Skadi appear to exhibit very clear Americanophile tendencies and blindly (like the Americans) to support  Donald Trump, the most pro-Zionist president to date of the United States. If you point out Trump's obvious ties to Jewish capital and the State of Israel you are met with stony silence. They refuse to acknowledge the man's very, very many shortcomings. (How the masses are so easily deceived) Some of these European posters self identify as National Socialist or sympathise with National Socialism but ignore the SOCIALIST aspect of the ideology and promote a capitalist economic system-something which I completely reject. The means of production should be controlled by the workers and not the elite who benefit like parasites on the backs of the true wealth creators-the workers.

The Apricity forum is far more active with many more posters than Skadi but despite this forum being a "European Cultural Community" there are posters of any and all races and from all countries posting on there. The owner and administrator of the forum goes by the name of 'Loki' (photographed wearing tin foil on his head) but despite his odd choice of user name he is a passionate advocate for the Christian religion and does not tolerate any open criticism of Christianity. Promoting Germanic heathenism is openly discouraged and for this reason and my 'leftist' politics (I am not a rabid hater of Islam) I was banned. The reason for the permanent ban: "your leftist politics won't fit here, also your heathenry won't." During the few days that I used that forum I observed many banned accounts, resembling somewhat of a 'purge'.

It is quite disturbing to see how European nationalists (both civic and ethno-nationalists) have swallowed the anti-Islam rhetoric of people like 'Tommy Robinson' , the EDL and the Britain First party. However I first observed this tendency about 15 years ago in the sudden shift by Griffin from addressing the racial question to promoting a false kind of Christianity which they attempted to use as a  cultural banner to rally around to attack Islam. This tendency has now become the norm within British nationalism. Islam is seen as an easy victim and thus this is focused upon instead of Zionism. Organisations such as the EDL are openly Zionist, multicultural and multiracial although some of the ne'er do wells within its ranks seem to forget this when they engage in racist rhetoric and Nazi salutes! This goes to show that the average levels of intelligence and educational attainment have never been very high in nationalist organisations and movements and they tend to attract some of the worst elements of society.

Despite the current political rift between the USA and western Europe this schism does not appear to be reflected in the sympathies of European nationalists or National Socialists who appear to have a slavish support for the USA, possibly because they are attracted to the populism of Trump and the disingenuous anti-'swamp' rhetoric. They see Trump as being a saviour, a rallying point to gather around to oppose the New World Order and yet fail to understand that the USA is at the very centre of the NWO which they claim to oppose! What Trump in reality is doing is not separating the USA from the NWO but consolidating its power and seeking to increase its influence within that NWO and the centrality of Israel who is its master.

I also note that there is a tendency among nationalists and National Socialists to support the military despite the fact that the military does not exist to protect or promote the welfare of the people but the elite. I find it ironic that some of those on Skadi who support conscription have not served in the military themselves and have no intention (when challenged) of ever serving. A typical double standard. It is always SOMEBODY ELSE who has to do the dirty work.

The issue of the nation State and my current thinking regarding this will be addressed in a coming article as I intend to spend quite a bit of time discussing my evolving attitude and thinking.

Tuesday, January 01, 2019

Latest Attack on English Free Speech: the Online Forums Bill

On 11/9/2018 a Private Members' Bill was introduced by Lucy Powell, Labour MP for Manchester Central supported by the following MPs Nicky Morgan, Robert Halfon, Robert Neil, David Lammy, Anna Soubry, Jacob Rees-Mogg (yes you read that correctly), Ruth Smeeth, Luciana Berger, Stella Creasey and Jess Phillips. Some of these names will be familiar to my readers but what came as a shock to me was that someone like Rees-Mogg could give his support to this piece of pernicious proposed legislation.

I have attached a link to the Bill published online. I have read the Bill and it concerns placing a legal responsibility on the administrators and moderators of online forums for the content of the posts that are published on the said forums. Administrators and moderators that permit the publishing of posts with 'illegal' content would be guilty of a criminal offence that would be punishable by a prison sentence not exceeding 7 years and/or a fine. The Bill covers England and Wales. It is rather curious that the Bill does not actually define 'illegal' contents but the record of the First Reading is highly illuminating and I strongly recommend that my readers study all of the available parliamentary documents to be found by clicking on the link.

Powell in her introduction of the Bill refers to "the spreading of hate, racism, misogyny, antisemitism or misinformation", the latter term I understand is a euphemism for the much vaunted 'fake news' which has crept into the popular vernacular and has deep Orwellian undertones. Unless I am mistaken 'misogyny' is not a crime in England and Wales but I notice that Powell does not refer to the gender opposite of misogyny which is misandry. Having emotions whether they be love or hate is not yet a criminal offence in this country much to the chagrin I am sure of many of our political representatives! What is also not yet an offence is publishing alternative interpretations of current events but this Bill if passed could go some way to effectively outlawing any challenge to the official State and Capitalist narrative. This is why non-western news stations such as RT (Russia Today) are constantly singled out for attack in Parliament and has been again recently.

Wikipedia has a profile on Powell and it refers to her promotion of this Bill and it makes this very worrying comment: "This law has arisen in the context of legal precedent having been created whereby the context and intention of utterance is no longer pertinent in the defence of a hate speech charge, effectively rendering victims of the policy without the ability to defend themselves."  Hitherto it has always been incumbent upon the prosecution to prove INTENT. This Bill is the first that removes that requirement! It is Powell's intention that online discussion Forums, even private ones should be subject to the same journalistic standards as the media. This is patently ridiculous and it effectively further outlaws what little remains of our freedom of speech and our capability to inform our fellow citizens-something which the State is clearly terrified of.

As an aside I would remark that when a regime realises that it is on borrowed time it becomes more oppressive but any regime can be effectively opposed. Let us not forget how the USSR and the DDR came to an end, a PEACEFUL end by civil opposition. As a people we simply have to say "no more" and peacefully resist. These people are supposed to be our representatives, our servants, not our jailers but the United Kingdom is fast becoming one immense human jail where 'Thought Crime' now exists. Once upon our time only actions were outlawed, now words are outlawed. If you outlaw words and opinions you are also effectively outlawing thoughts which are inconvenient to the regime. This is nothing less than 'Thought Crime'.

The beginning of the curtailment of our freedoms began in 1986 with the Public Order Act, Part 3 of which prohibits "expressions of racial hatred" which effectively was the first piece of legislation to prevent our lawful opposition to our biological replacement in the land of our ancestors. Since then year by year new laws have been added to the statute book by both Conservative and Labour administrations to further shackle and emasculate us as a  people. This is just the latest attempt and it is a bloody disgrace. This Bill would provide the Police and Intelligence Agencies the legal authority to spy on our secret discussions which are often carried out by private messaging between forum members. Nothing effectively would be secret or private any longer. I quote Powell's literal words: "It would also stop groups being completely secret." THAT is sinister and again reminds me of George Orwell's Nineteen Eightyfour where no citizen is allowed any measure of privacy from the ever watchful eye of 'Big Brother'.

As I mentioned at the beginning this is a Private Members' Bill and most Private Members' Bills do not become legislation. However if the government is encouraged to get behind the Bill and support it then it certainly could. There is currently an online petition on the Parliamentary website which I have signed and I would encourage all of my concerned readers to sign (providing that you are resident in the United Kingdom). This is the link to the petition: Stop the Online Forums Bill and this is a link to the published Bill and introduction by Powell: Online Forums Bill The Second Reading of the Bill is scheduled to take place on 25/1/2019 which will mark the first full debate on the Bill. This should be covered live on the BBC Parliament channel.

I have mentioned several times in this article the name of George Orwell or Nineteen Eightyfour. Earlier this evening I kept getting Orwell's Nineteen Eightyfour in my mind, so much so that I started sourcing a copy online to buy as I have not read it in over 40 years and no longer have my original copy. Half an hour later I decided to check Wulf Ingesunnu's Inglinga blog and I saw that his latest post, posted today was indeed about Nineteen Eightyfour; clearly an example of synchronicity. This has happened many times over the years and this alone has compelled me to urgently write this article today. Here is a link to Wulf's post: