Wednesday, October 31, 2018

National Socialism: A 'Left-Wing' Movement-Some Observations and Suggestions for its Development

I have recently had an opportunity to reread Povl Heinrich Riis-Knudsen's excellent National Socialism:A Left-Wing Movement (1984) and National Socialism: The Biological World View (1987). It has been many years since I initially read these booklets but my own Weltanschauung has gradually developed along the same lines as Riis-Knudsen.

It is a common mistake made not only by our enemies but also by people who regard themselves as National Socialists that it is regarded as a 'right-wing' political philosophy. This is a mistake-a serious mistake. Words matter and how we define National Socialism matters for this shapes how we view the world. The concepts of 'left' and 'right-wing' are out-moded concepts which date back to the days of pre-revolutionary France when supporters of the king sat to his right in the National Assembly whilst those members who supported the revolution to his left. This may have worked very well in 18th century France but has little relevance to politics in the 20th and 21st centuries and yet people foolishly use these terms with very little forethought.

National Socialism was and is a revolutionary movement and philosophy which seeks to overturn the current political system. Therefore if we are going to use the terms 'left' or 'right wing' then we can only conclude one thing: National Socialism is a 'left-wing' movement. It does not seek to sustain the system but to completely abolish it. Riis-Knudsen makes the valid observation:
"If National Socialism is, in its essence, a left-wing movement, it is, of course, paradoxical that National Socialists should have devoted so much time and energy to catering toward traditional right-wing attitudes, whereas they have shunned all openings to the left. Is it any wonder that all attempts to create a National Socialist movement on this basis have been utterly unsuccessful?"
Over many years I have never understood the attitude of many ethno-nationalists and white nationalists who tend in their attitudes to be very scathing of issues relating to the environment, trade unionism and by and large, especially the American ones, tend to support the system of capitalism, which has so spectacularly failed in the 'west' and has on many occasions been propped up by the tax payer (vis-à-vis the global banking crisis of 2008). Capitalism is a system that benefits the elite at the expense of the many. Americans are quick to point out that Communism 'never worked' and yet there are countries in the world where this system has worked and where it has it is the majority of people who benefit and not the few. Of course the weakness of the Marxist variant of Communism is its lack of spiritual vision: Marxism is purely a materialist philosophy concerned purely with economics. By contrast National Socialism is an holistic world view.

Capitalism by contrast has helped to create the current immigration crisis in the 'west'. The western armaments industry and its bought political whores agitate for war after war in order to maintain a market for these merchants of death to sell their disgusting weapons. We have seen an acceleration of arms sales since Trump helped to kickstart the new 'Cold War' in 2017, a 'Cold War' which shows every sign of turning into a real war involving Russia and/or China. (I will discuss this in a future article if the 'button' has not been pressed before then!) War inevitably results in refugees. Now I realise that many of the so-called 'refugees' that find their way to the shores and borders of northern Europe are not genuine refugees but there are many who are and these are the ones that tend to move to the next safe country as they genuinely are fleeing for their lives. The ones that make their way to northern Europe are not in my opinion genuine. This refugee crisis suits the capitalists very well as it helps to push wages down as the workforce is artificially swelled due to their presence. Thus capitalism creates the problem and then takes advantage of it! Capitalists are the true parasites and they have no loyalty to folk or land. They are truly cosmopolitan: they are thus the true enemy of National Socialism and of the people.

Trade Unions in the 1960s were still to a certain extent Marxist free and were concerned soley with the improvement of their members' conditions of employment, not engaging in irrelevant political campaigns. However the educated student generation of the late 1960s have since entered spheres of influence and have not entirely shed their Marxist indoctrination from their university days. My late brother was a university student, the first time in the late 60s and early 70s and went through a youthful phase of being a Marxist and an anarchist. By the time that he died at 58 in May 2009 he was by his own admission a 'Conservative' (whether this was of the small 'c' variety or the capital 'C' I am not sure!). However many of these people entered very influential positions in the field of law, politics, commerce and education. It is largely these people who have set in motion the cancer which has afflicted our society; the cancer of politically correct ideology. However there is nothing wrong in essence with the concept of a trade union movement. Some of my readers may be aware that some of the greatest of our racialist writers in the English speaking world were also socialist! I am thinking in particular of the likes of  Jack London who was both a racialist and a socialist. Even William Morris who is lauded as a Marxist had very clear folkish leanings and translated the Volsunga Saga and produced works of fiction based upon Germanic heathenism. These people saw no contradiction in this.  This article may be of interest: Jack London: When Socialism was Racist

In the mid 1960s trade unions in Britain still campaigned AGAINST mass immigration for they realised that this threatened the jobs of native workers. This inconvenient fact of history is deliberately ignored by modern day trade unions for it challenges their myopic view of the recent past. I see no reason why National Socialists should not be actively involved in trade unions. It is interesting to note that those trade union leaders and representatives who are more moderate in their approach tend to be ineffective. The Marxists understand this and they are not afraid to challenge employers. National Socialists too must not be afraid to be radical.

I dare say that some of my American readers will be uncomfortable with some of the points and suggestions which I am making in this article. Americans whether they be white nationalists or not tend to view Europe as being 'socialist' and by comparison with the USA they may well be right! However this observation is not made in a positive way as the prevailing culture in the USA is pro-capitalist and antagonistic to anything which may be viewed as 'socialist'. White nationalism is not in my opinion a genuine political philosophy. It is devoid of any true vision or Weltanschauung. It is reactive, seeking only to return society to a recent mythical past. Instead National Socialism looks forward, seeking revolutionary change, not conservation. Thus there can be no real accommodation between white nationalism and genuine National Socialism which in my opinion is only to be found in Europe.

What passes as 'National Socialism' in the USA is generally a fetishism for Third Reich uniforms, 1930s haircuts and toothbrush moustaches. It is costume play, nothing more. We also must not confuse National Socialism with 'hate'. Genuine National Socialists do not hate others because of their race or religion. They seek not the genocide or annihilation of other races but their preservation. THIS is true multiracialism, not the forced race-mixing found in modern day 'western' countries. It is only when diverse races and peoples are forced to live alongside one another that 'hatred' arises. The architects of our replacement, of our genocide are the true 'haters', not us.

Too often I see on various websites knuckle dragging comments made about other races including Jews and Muslims and these comments demean the people who make them. Their behaviour is far from 'Aryan'. Idiots who promote genocide of other races do our cause a great deal of harm and these cretins must be actively opposed at any and every opportunity. I will not tolerate any fool attempting to make such idiotic comments on this blog-they will not be published. Our battle is against Zionism, not Jews per se. Many of these knuckle draggers fail to understand that Zionists can be of any race or ethnicity and many of them are not Jewish at all and indeed many fundamentalist Christians tend to gravitate towards supporting the goals of Zionism and even declare themselves to be Zionists (Steve Bannon et al). There is nothing to be gained by targeting a particular ethnic or religious group. Such action is counter productive and is the worst kind of publicity imaginable. By behaving in a hateful fashion one is conforming oneself to a Hollywood stereotype. Unfortunately too many people go down this route and achieve nothing but a lengthy prison sentence.

National Socialism is an age old philosophy known and practiced by our ancestors before the term was invented in the 1920s for it follows the cast iron laws of nature. It is a philosophy that may be applied to any and all people, not just the Aryan. Even if man were to cease to exist National Socialism will not end for it is reflected as I say in the laws of nature. However I have come to the conclusion that the use of the term 'National Socialism' in a public context should be avoided. It carries too much historical and negative 'baggage'. The philosophy and goals need not change but the terminology must. Likewise those of you who believe yourselves to be National Socialist who have a penchant for Third Reich costume play must desist from engaging in this infantile behaviour; it is moronic and has nothing to do with genuine National Socialism. It is also high time that people stopped using the fylfot (swastika) as a symbol of this philosophy. It does absolutely no good in this day and age. Whilst in 1930s Germany it may have exerted a magical influence upon the collective psyche of the Volk it is now practically useless as a public symbol. It should be reserved for personal and esoteric use only.

There is no point at all in attempting to promote an overtly National Socialist agenda as this cannot succeed. It would be far better for National Socialists to embrace the causes which are normally associated with the 'left' whether these be to do with environmental issues such as climate change or fracking or trade unionism. We must take the ground that is currently occupied by Marxist Socialists and win this ground for genuine National SOCIALISM.

Saturday, October 27, 2018

The Perilous State of English Nationalism

Over recent weeks I have followed the unfolding course of events regarding the notorious case of 'Tommy Robinson' and his most recent court appearance and I am deeply troubled. Most of my readers, certainly those who are based in England will be aware of 'Robinson's' pivotal role in the founding of the English Defence League in 2009 and then his subsequent abandonment of it in 2011. Since then he has managed to remain in the limelight often due to court appearances that have nothing whatsoever to do with the notion of 'defending freedom of speech'. Details of 'Robinson's' criminal record may be easily found on the Internet and I will leave it to my readers to carry out their own research in this matter as that issue is not really what this article is about.

It is a common misconception that 'defending freedom of speech' was what his last conviction was for, particularly in the USA where 'everything goes' as far as the media circus surrounding trials is concerned. This is not the case in England where judges (for good reasons) place restrictions on the reporting of judicial proceedings to prevent either the miscarriage of justice or from trials which are linked being jeopardised. This was the case in the matter of the recent trial of the Huddersfield grooming gang. If the trial had have collapsed or the defendants appealed against their convictions then an expensive retrial would have been necessary. This is why responsible journalists-REAL journalists obey judges' instructions. I will not comment further on this particular case regarding 'Robinson' as judge Nicolas Hilliard QC, the Recorder of London has referred the matter for further consideration to the Attorney General for England and Wales.

Since Robinson's latest period of imprisonment between May and August 2018  he has received a great deal of attention, sympathy and last but not least donations of money from supporters all over the world. My understanding is that a 'former assistant' has revealed that the total sum is £2,000,000 (see the Daily Mail (21/10/18). If this is the case then no doubt much of this money will be spent on lawyers. There are unconfirmed reports that a substantial quantity of the said funds have their origin in the USA. If this is true then this does not surprise me as much of the propaganda support emerges from that country.

One of 'Robinson's' principal backers in terms of funding his legal fund, propaganda and publicity is the Middle East Forum, an American 'conservative think tank' based in Philadelphia, founded by Daniel Pipes, a 69 year old American Jew. The focus of the organisation is on Islam and middle eastern affairs. It apparently advocates 'stronger ties with Israel'. It is generally regarded as being 'zionist'. One of 'Robinson's' former employers is Rebel Media who briefly employed him as a 'journalist'. Rebel Media was founded by Ezra Levant, a Canadian Jew and that website is supposedly 'far right'. In reality it is amongst other things a platform for anti-Islam propaganda.

At the time of 'Robinson's' latest spell in prison the US government appears to have exerted pressure on the British government. President Trump's 'Ambassador for International Religious Freedom', Sam Brownback reportedly told the UK Ambassador Sir Kim Darroch that Breitbart had "contacted him about Robinson's imprisonment" and reportedly "suggested the UK should be more sympathetic" to 'Robinson' or the US government "might publicly criticise its handling of the case." (See The Independent, 17/7/18). If this is true then once again we see the meddling interference of the US government in the affairs of a sovereign state, something which it would not tolerate if such interference were aimed at them! What Brownback fails to understand is that unlike the USA the judiciary in the United Kingdom is entirely independent of the executive arm of government-something which at least we should be thankful for!

Breitbart News is yet another 'far right' website, its former Executive Chairman was Steve Bannon, who declares himself to be a 'Christian Zionist'. (See the article by Amanda House,, 13/11/17.) Bannon you will recall was until recently the White House Chief Strategist and Senior Counsellor to Trump. Trump's son Donald Trump, Junior tweeted in support of 'Robinson': "Reason #1776 for the original #brexit. Don't let America follow in those footsteps."

The support for 'Robinson' is clearly gaining momentum and much of this support is coming from 'respectable' and 'mainstream' sources. UKIP leader Gerard Batten is in favour of changing the rules of UKIP to make an exception for the admittance of 'Robinson' into the party. At the moment former members of the BNP and the EDL are not permitted to join that party. Former leader Nigel Farrage is against such a move and has warned that the party faces "total and utter marginalisation" if such a move were to go ahead. Shortly after his latest court appearance 'Robinson' was 'wined and dined' in the House of Lords by Batten and UKIP peer Lord Peerson. (See the Evening Standard, 24/10/18). These are all moves aimed at improving 'Robinson's' 'respectability' and no doubt a cynical attempt to resurrect the fortunes of UKIP at the ballot box. This is a huge gamble by Batten. He will either succeed or his party will effectively be destroyed in the attempt. What votes may be gained from the knuckle dragging uneducated few will result in the lost votes of the respectable many in the next elections.

Make no mistake if 'Robinson' is admitted I very much doubt that he will be satisfied at just remaining an ordinary member. Only the leadership of the party will suffice. If that happens then it will go the way of the BNP. Indeed subsequent to coming to this conclusion I have researched the UKIP Daily website and found a comment by a poster called 'Tacitus' who speculates that Batten views 'Robinson' as a potential successor to himself (Tommy Robinson: Result = Intention, 27/10/18, 4.26pm). I invite my readers to study the comments and articles on that forum. It makes for disturbing reading. Clearly UKIP, possibly in a bid to regain populist support is now trying to court the anti-Islamic vote, something which under the leadership of Mr Farrage it steadfastly refused to do. However in my opinion the admittance of 'Robinson' into UKIP will divide the party as he is most certainly a divisive figure in British society and the comments of some of his fanatical supporters on YouTube regarding muslims are extremely disturbing. Any attempt at educating some of these people in my experience results in one being called a muslim and/or a 'paedophile'. Indeed one supposedly 'Christian' woman accused me of 'bestiality'. THAT is the level of discourse sustained by these knuckle draggers. It truly worries me that these people have the electoral franchise. What a mistake that was to extend it to the masses!

In addition to the support of the current UKIP leader 'Robinson' has been invited by Republicans to the USA to deliver a speech to the US Congress. This would be very interesting as the last time that 'Robinson' attempted to gain entry into the USA he was convicted of "possession of a false identity document" in 2013 when he boarded a flight from Heathrow to New York. He used a passport of a friend, Andrew McMaster. He travelled back to England the following day. This time 'Robinson' or to use his real name (or is it?) Stephen Christopher Yaxley-Lennon (born Stephen Christopher Yaxley, sometimes known as Stephen Lennon) used his own passport-in the name of Paul Harris! Yes, sometimes the 'truth is stranger than fiction'. In the words of the judge: "I am going to sentence you under the name of Stephen Lennon although I suspect that is not actually your true name, in the sense that it is not the name that appears on your passport." (See Daily Telegraph 7/1/13). The Daily Telegraph reports on his previous convictions and no doubt they were the reason why he used someone else's passport as they would have prevented him from entering the USA legally! So effectively the US government would have to give special permission for 'Robinson' to enter the USA if he were to address Congress.

'Robinson' is not in my opinion a genuine 'nationalist', not in the sense that those of us who are folkish are wont to use the term, in the sense of ethno-nationalism. The pseudo-nationalism of most modern day recently constituted British 'nationalist' organisations is very much a civic one, where anybody born in England is regarded as 'English' and anyone born in Britain is 'British'. This civic nationalism is promoted alongside anti-muslim sentiment and such organisations are often zionist. One frequently observes Israeli flags amongst the massed ranks of EDL and 'Robinson' supporters and demonstrators. Indeed 'Robinson' freely admits to being a zionist. (See The Independent, 5/7/17) The 'anti-racist' credentials of the EDL were spectacularly demonstrated when they were photographed burning a Third Reich Swastika flag in a disused office block in Luton, standing in front of a poster saying: "English Defence League. Black and white unite." (See Daily Telegraph, 10/10/09). These are not the actions of ethno-nationalists. In fact they are the very opposite and should be viewed by real nationalists as part of the problem, not the solution. Indeed it is ironic that 'Robinson' is lauded by his followers as an 'English hero' when the truth of the matter is his parents were Irish immigrants from the Republic of Ireland. He is thus a 'second generation immigrant'.

It is civic nationalism and not ethno-nationalism which is gathering support these days, no doubt due to the efforts of such organisations as the EDL and the Britain First party which is also anti-Islamic, pro-Christian and pro-Jewish. Zionism has effectively co-opted nationalist sentiment in England and transformed it into being multi-racial and pro-zionist. Thus zionism has succeeded in remodelling nationalism into a vehicle which it can use to oppose muslims in the 'west' in the furtherance of its aims for a 'Greater Israel' beyond the current political boundaries of that state. Furthermore the stoking up of anti-Islamic sentiment also feeds in to the zionist narrative of continual war in the middle east against those states who oppose the hegemony of the Tel Aviv-Washington axis. Civic nationalism promotes the faulty thinking that simply being born in a country or having the passport of that country magically transforms that person into being part of the 'nation'. It does not!