Tuesday, October 03, 2017

Age Now Just a 'Social Construct'

This is an article that I have been contemplating writing for some time now. It should be apparent to anyone that here in the 'West' we live in a youth culture, a society that prizes youth above all else and has done for quite some time. When this started to happen is difficult to detect but certainly it has been in existence since at least the early 1940s with the rise of popular music, crooners such as Frank Sinatra who in status and popularity would be the equivalent of Elvis Presley a decade later. In terms of popular youth culture the 1940s Jazz music and 'Zoot Suiters' were the origins of the 1950s Teddy Boy culture which led of course to the Rockers of the 1960s. I am not going to go into detail about these cultures in this article as it is unnecessary but suffice it to say that capitalism began to view young people as a growing market to sell their goods to, most especially music, clothes, cars and motorcycles. This is when the rot set in.

Gradually over the decades new and more diverse youth cultures were created (often artificially-such as 'Punk Rock') for the marketing and sale of merchandise. It is often (and incorrectly said) that the 'Baby Boomers' were responsible for this phenomena but this is incorrect for the oldest of this generation were not born until immediately after WWII. Youth culture was already in existence by the early 1940s. What is true though is that some of those who aligned to the youth culture of their day never grew up, still walking around in the attire of their youth, refusing to admit the encroachment of age. It is not unusual to see OAP Teddy Boys for instance. The vast majority did outgrow their youthful affiliations but nevertheless because of the indoctrination that 'young is best' refuse to acknowledge the aging process. Since the 1940s at least aging is frowned upon in western society despite the fact that most of us do get old eventually. This is an inevitable process of nature and should not be feared, frowned upon or ignored. Indeed my argument is that we should embrace it.

Most people alive today in 2017 would have been exposed to some form of youth culture when they were young and are therefore still susceptible to the lie that 'young is best' but often will be totally oblivious to the fact that they have been indoctrinated for it is so engrained in the collective psyche. This has certainly become more obvious in the last 10 years as the oldest of the 'Baby Boomers' started to reach old age. So accustomed to the trappings of a youth culture and the fake 'validity' that such associations bring many if not most deny the fact that they are old as if this were something to be ashamed of. Over recent years we have started to hear ridiculous and vacuous statements that "60 is the new 50", then "60 is the new 40", then "60 is the new 30" and now would you credit it "60 is the new 20!" Makes you wonder what 20 is, minus 40 perhaps? It is meaningless, it is vacuous and it is marketing crap. Nothing has happened to human DNA in the 20th century onwards to explain this rather strange phenomena so let's treat it with the contempt that it deserves.

Apart from the pernicious influence of marketing from globalist capitalist corporations much of this propaganda (which is exactly what it is) is encouraged by western governments because of their concern over an 'aging' population. Alongside these aforementioned stupid statements we have governments now peddling the lie that "we are all getting older". This is patently not true. With the exception of my father who died at the grand age of 103 in 2015 most people I know and those I am related to died in their 50s, 60s and 70s. Some in their 40s and 20s. People are not getting older. It is just that the population has grown and thus more old people are alive. Also once the Baby Boomer generation (which includes me) is dead and gone any imbalances in population demographics will automatically right itself and balance out again. So if there were any truth to their propaganda it is merely a temporary state of affairs which will correct itself within 20 years at the most. Governments are using this as an excuse to increase pension ages thus creating greater competition for jobs and this has the effect of driving wages down. This should show us clearly what side the British government is on-not the British working man but global corporations who prop them up. Basically the British government like ALL western governments exists as the political front man and enforcer of the faceless, rootless, cosmopolitan tribe which controls international finance and national economies.

Indeed this sense of rootlessness is encouraged in the young who are indoctrinated to think of themselves as 'global citizens' and that they should treat the entire world as a labour market that they can just emigrate to. Loyalty to nation, race and homeland is discouraged and viewed as being 'racist', 'hateful' and 'neo-nazi'. It is in the interests of global capitalism that people no longer see their identity in terms of race, ethnicity, nationality or gender but should be one coffee-coloured, genderless and ageless mix-a one size suits all society to make global marketing child's play. By encouraging the elderly to continue to slog their guts out until they die they are in effect creating a global serfdom, NOT a workforce.

By deceiving older people in to believing themselves to be younger than they are they causing people to accept the notion that 'young is good' and 'old is bad'. This is untraditional. This concept (for the time being) exists only in the 'West' and is alien to those cultures who are still holding onto their roots. In such societies when one reaches the age of 60 for instance one is revered and sought out for advice and wisdom. In the 'West' instead the young are encouraged not to seek out their elders but instead spend 30 minutes on the Internet to get all the 'wisdom' that they need. In recent years government departments have instructed their staff not to refer to old people as the 'elderly', 'old' or 'aged' but as 'older' in case it causes 'offence'. This is ostensibly the reason but in my view this is pernicious propaganda designed as an Orwellian attempt to rewrite the English dictionary. By avoiding the use of a word they foolishly think that they can eradicate the reality of aging. Patent nonsense but western governments are no longer rooted in the real world but are totally culturally Marxist. Orwell referred to this process as 'Newspeak'. I have long said that if you control a person's vocabulary you control their thoughts and if you control their thoughts you ultimately control their actions. This is the essence of 'political correctness'. The following article discusses avoiding 'ageist' language in the media http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/4596139/Elderly-no-longer-acceptable-word-for-older-people.html My English readers should note that in the USA anyone over 50 can be described as elderly whilst in this country it is traditionally reserved for people over 60. That should be taken into consideration when viewing the Daily Telegraph article.

Here is another example of batshit insanity:

As people live longer, the boundaries of what constitutes middle and old age are ever shifting. 
And now one of the UK's leading social scientists has called for an end to the term 'old age', saying that people in their 60s, 70s and 80s should be referred to as 'active adults'.
Sarah Harper, a gerontologist who is director of the Oxford Institute of Ageing told the Hay Festival that people shouldn't be considered old until they reach a stage where they're very feeble and nearing death. 
Therefore even someone in their 90s may not be considered old if they're still living an active life." http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-4559172/Ageing-expert-calls-word-old-BANNED.html

So there you go by banishing the word 'old' you eliminate old age over night, something which the alchemists of old would have given their forearm for! In the minds of the 'social scientists' (a meaningless discipline) age like race and gender are just 'social constructs'. We should see this for the Marxist lie that it undoubtedly is. According to these wizards of political correctness each hour we are alive we gain an extra 15 minutes! I wonder where the scientific formula is to substantiate this childish nonsense? A further claim of the article author is that "some may not inherit from grandparents until they are in their 80s." That would seem to suggest that people will be living to 120-150 years of age. These fools never once question whether it is DESIREABLE to reach extreme old age!

The other consequence of desiring that people live longer is that if they are successful we will further contribute to global overpopulation of the planet and the strain on Mother Nature's precious resources but it is however 'good for business' with a global serfdom and a raceless, genderless, ageless consumership. So there you go you are not 'old' until you are near death and thus you should be a work slave!

Age is devalued by the NWO because it is threatening to its propaganda. The older you are the more that you realise that there is something drastically wrong with the world and how it is governed compared to when one was young and this recognition increases with age. This is threatening to the propaganda put out by the NWO which is more easily swallowed by the young. It is a scientific fact that the younger you are the more uncritical you are of what you are told. Educationalists realise this and take the opportunity to brainwash children whilst they are young. By devaluing the concept of age-related wisdom they are seeking to prevent the young from listening to and learning from the elders which was traditional in ancient Aryan societies and is still the case in many non-western societies today. They prefer that the young receive their 'wisdom' instantly from the www (666) and thus they control the flow of information and thus what the young may be exposed to. A consistent message is therefore conveyed and it is interesting to see how western governments are introducing laws to control what is 'news' on the Internet and political dissent on the Internet particularly of a nationalist nature is shortly to be banned by Amber Rudd, the not so friendly face of the NWO. More on this shortly.

The push by capitalist corporations that everybody should have a smartphone (a message that the young are particularly susceptible to) is to enable a consistent flow of propaganda in the form of 'news'. This is an unholy partnership with national governments who will shortly be legislating what may be viewed upon the Internet and will ban any unauthorised interpretation of the news. The Internet over recent years has certainly been useful to those of us engaged in the struggle to free our folk but the end of our current very limited freedoms is in sight so we need to develop alternative methods of reaching the masses if at all possible.


CountWolf said...

We live in scary times indeed. Thank you for bringing all of this to light. I see you don't get many comments (and so I imagine not many subscribers) which is such a shame, considering the quality of what you post.

Keep up the good fight!

Wotans Krieger said...

Thank you-I appreciate your comment!