"Violent and non-violent extremism in all its forms – Anti-Semitism, neo-Nazism, Islamophobia, intolerance of women’s rights – these, and others, cannot be permitted to fester. Our values are far, far better than this. And we owe it to ourselves to root this hatred out wherever it emerges."
My readers will note how she singles out "Anti-Semitism", "neo-Nazism" and "Islamophobia" for special mention. Not a single reference to the violent anti-fa or Islamism, just worldviews that she would regard as being 'far right'. Who gets to determine what is 'extremist' and then.....what? There are currently NO laws on the statute book in England that outlaws any one of the aforementioned world views. Given that the Conservative Party are now a minority government she may indeed struggle to pass any legislation to give teeth to her intentions.
We have seen over the last year how the British government has adopted a new international definition of 'Anti-Semitism' which includes:
"In addition, such manifestations could also target the state of Israel, conceived as a Jewish collectivity. Antisemitism frequently charges Jews with conspiring to harm humanity, and it is often used to blame Jews for “why things go wrong.” It is expressed in speech, writing, visual forms and action, and employs sinister stereotypes and negative character traits."
So now under the new definition of 'Anti-Semitism' even legitimate criticism of the illegal and apartheid practices of the state of Israel and its crimes is 'Anti-Semitism'! One wonders what punishments they will create for those who persist in exposing Israel? Even exposing Jewish influence in the media and global capitalism is now 'Anti-Semitism':
"Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as collective — such as, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions."
According to this definition even accusations of "real wrongdoing" is 'Anti-Semitism':
" Accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined wrongdoing committed by a single Jewish person or group, or even for acts committed by non-Jews."
Nationalists, White Nationalists and National Socialists all have differing views on the 'holocaust'. Some accept the claims of a 6,000,000 genocide as being real and historic, some accept that it took place but disagree with the figures whilst other deny it in its entirety. As with any historical or debatable historic 'fact' it should not be exempt from both analysis and debate or we are making a secular religion out of it. (This has already happened) Regardless of where one stands on this issue one should be free in a truly democratic country to debate it. However powerful Jewish bodies both within and outside the United Kingdom manage to place a stranglehold on any public debate and attempt to censor the sale of perfectly legal literature that calls their version of history into question.https://www.thejc.com/news/world/under-pressure-amazon-stops-selling-holocaust-denial-books-1.433963
In the United Kingdom it is not illegal to question any aspect of the 'holocaust' and this is one of the few precious freedoms that we still have left.
Which western countries currently don't have holocaust denial laws on the statute book? The United States, the United Kingdom, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Canada, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Iceland, Italy, Jersey, Ireland, Macedonia, Malta, Ireland, Norway, Australia, New Zealand, Portugal, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Switzerland, Sweden, Ukraine and the Vatican City! So still a majority of countries both within and outside the western world do not have such pernicious legislation. By contrast the countries which have explicit or implicit legislation are: Germany, Austria, Belgium, France, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Greece, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg and Russia. The Netherlands is an interesting case for 'holocaust denial' is not explicitly illegal but the unjust courts interpret such denial as a form of 'spreading hatred' and thus an offence. Clearly the Dutch courts are heavily politicised for surely it is the Legislature that is supposed to formulate laws? It is the responsibility of the courts to make judgements on those who contravene the law but NOT to create laws. This is hardly 'democracy'.
However according to the new definition accepted by the British government analysing the 'holocaust' from an impartial perspective is now 'Anti-Semitism'
"Denying the fact, scope, mechanisms (e.g. gas chambers) or intentionality of the genocide of the Jewish people at the hands of National Socialist Germany and its supporters and accomplices during World War II (the Holocaust).Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust."
So there you have it according to the British government examination or questioning of any aspect of the 'holocaust' is 'Anti-Semitism'. We cannot even question an individual Jew's loyalty to the United Kingdom even when evidence is found to support this:
"Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations."
Even though we all know that the state of Israel has an immigration policy that only permits Jews to emigrate to Israel and receive Israeli nationality it is 'Anti-Semitism' to point this out. The system of Apartheid in Israel, its openly racist hostility towards Palestinian and Israeli Arabs and Israel's lack of an open door refugee policy if applied to a western country would be described as racist but to point out these inconvenient facts is regarded by the British government as 'Anti-Semitism':
"Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavour."
In fact comparing Israel's hypocrisy in the matter of the Palestinians against the treatment of Jews in the Third Reich also constitutes 'Anti-Semitism':
" Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis."
Israel is truly now beyond reproach and her influence and power increases each day. We should not be surprised by this for this is what Zionism is all about. The Old Testament is full of 'prophecies' concerning the plans of the Jewish desert tribal god to set up Jerusalem as the capital of the world and that all nations will serve Israel. Zionism is inextricably linked to these desires and plans for global domination. In the words of the first modern Prime Minister of Israel David Ben-Gurion:
""With the exception of the USSR as a federated Eurasian state, all other continents will become united in a world alliance, at whose disposal will be an international police force. All armies will be abolished, and there will be no more wars. In Jerusalem, the United Nations (a truly United Nations) will build a Shrine of the Prophets to serve the federated union of all continents; this will be the seat of the Supreme Court of Mankind, to settle all controversies among the federated continents, as prophesied by Isaiah."
In any other person, in any other people this conceit and self-deceit would be diagnosed as a psychosis. Indeed a thorough examination of the Bible, most especially the books of the Old Testament make this collective psychosis very clear. If you want to know what plans the state of Israel has in store for the world all you have to do is study their own writings and QUOTE them-there is nothing 'Anti-Semitic' in doing exactly that.
The following makes for uneasy reading for it advocates genocide against non-Jews already dwelling in Palestine:
1When the LORD thy God shall bring thee into the land whither thou goest to possess it, and hath cast out many nations before thee, the Hittites, and the Girgashites, and the Amorites, and the Canaanites, and the Perizzites, and the Hivites, and the Jebusites, seven nations greater and mightier than thou; 2And when the LORD thy God shall deliver them before thee; thou shalt smite them, and utterly destroy them; thou shalt make no covenant with them, nor shew mercy unto them: 3Neither shalt thou make marriages with them; thy daughter thou shalt not give unto his son, nor his daughter shalt thou take unto thy son. 4For they will turn away thy son from following me, that they may serve other gods: so will the anger of the LORD be kindled against you, and destroy thee suddenly. 5But thus shall ye deal with them; ye shall destroy their altars, and break down their images, and cut down their groves, and burn their graven images with fire. 6For thou art an holy people unto the LORD thy God: the LORD thy God hath chosen thee to be a special people unto himself, above all people that are upon the face of the earth.7The LORD did not set his love upon you, nor choose you, because ye were more in number than any people; for ye were the fewest of all people: 8But because the LORD loved you, and because he would keep the oath which he had sworn unto your fathers, hath the LORD brought you out with a mighty hand, and redeemed you out of the house of bondmen, from the hand of Pharaoh king of Egypt. 9Know therefore that the LORD thy God, he is God, the faithful God, which keepeth covenant and mercy with them that love him and keep his commandments to a thousand generations; 10And repayeth them that hate him to their face, to destroy them: he will not be slack to him that hateth him, he will repay him to his face. 11Thou shalt therefore keep the commandments, and the statutes, and the judgments, which I command thee this day, to do them." (Deuteronomy 7:1-11, AV)
By any reasonable standards Deuteronomy 7 is HATE literature and these passages more than any other give us an insight into both Judaism, Zionism and the disturbing psychopathic mind of 'god'. If this was Wotan talking about the German people imagine what the outcry would be! When I refer to Zionism by extension I also include most Christian denominations under that category for it is possible of course to be non-Jewish and a Zionist and to be both Jewish and anti-Zionist.
Going back to Rudd's speech she is seeking to not only outlaw terrorist political activity (which is understandable and I am not criticising this) but the READING of anything which is contrary to the state. I am not even talking about reading things which advocate illegal acts but the reading of things which do not. She is referring to "non-violent extremism in all its forms". So according to this anything which questions the political status-quo, that advocates an alternative political system to neo-liberalism "cannot be permitted to fester". She includes National Socialism in that. What is she going to do? Outlaw an idea? Outlaw a concept? When will people like her realise that this does not work and is ultimately counterproductive? Particularly interesting is that she seems to imply that even criticism of feminism should not be "permitted to fester" either! This amounts to the Orwellian concept of 'Thought Crime'. Not content with monitoring, censoring and punishing us for our words they now come after our thoughts as well! What a nightmarish Orwellian world she is seeking to impose upon us all!
How is Rudd going to put her agenda into action? She is proposing the establishment of a Commission on Countering Extremism.
"The commission would be established as a statutory body, legally compelled to identify extremism in communities where it threatens to undermine British values." http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/theresa-may-conservative-manchester-attack-general-election-2017-commission-countering-extremism-a7759486.html
There you go again yet another reference to the rather vacuous term "British values". Rudd threatens to imprison people for viewing terrorist material online but it is not clear from the wording of her statement whether this also applies to 'non-violent' political material which is deemed by her to be 'extremist'. In addition to the quango commission that has been proposed it is clear that there will be yet more spying on the citizens of the United Kingdom online and possibly a beefing up of the STASI like 'Prevent' strategy which involves teachers spying on schoolchildren for any signs of political deviance including you guessed it, National Socialism!