Lascaux cave art

Lascaux cave art

Monday, July 25, 2016

Odin's Triple Horn on Scandinavian Picture Stones

This article should be read in conjunction with http://armanen.blogspot.co.uk/2015/05/the-triple-horns-of-odin.html

I was prompted to write this after reading some uniformed review on Amazon.de regarding a triple horns of Odin amulet. The writer was trying to convince people that this is a 'wiccan' symbol. Nothing could be further from the truth. Wicca in the form that it is known (perhaps excluding Seax Wicca) is an entirely unhistoric religion and a universalist one at that, often of great appeal to feminists and homosexuals because of its particular Goddess orientation.

Whilst our Germanic heathen faith is also reconstructed it is nevertheless based upon an historic foundation although sometimes it is in danger of appearing as nothing more than a form of historical re-enactment! The symbol of the triple horn appears in several Scandinavia picture stones such as the Snoldelev Stone from Ramos, Denmark, dating back to the 9th century CE and on one of the Gotland Stones from 10th century Sweden.

The triple horns on the Snoldelev Stone appear alongside a fylfot, emphasising its association with Odin. Likewise on the Gotland Stone it appears alongside a Valknut, a symbol that is universally recognised by its association with Odin. It is not unusual for those in the Wicca religion to co-opt Germanic heathen symbols. The Runes are one example of this and it may help to explain why some insist on calling them 'Celtic'. The Celts of course did not use runes but their druids did have a writing system which is probably of more recent origin than Runes and this is Ogham.

Saturday, July 23, 2016

Why Aryan Man must once again become a Vira and Master of his own Hearth

Over recent years I have observed an extremely disturbing trend in the so-called white nationalist 'movement'. Feminism is getting a hold upon the thinking of our people. I have spent some time making constructive contributions to a new blog which is supposed to be about heathenism but has nothing to say about heathenism whilst  the author, a female, is obsessed with male-female relations, jews and the Third Reich and is quite clearly a feminist. I will not name this blog or the author as in my opinion it is not worth giving any attention to it. However it is clearly necessary to restate some simple truths. In not doing so there is a danger that younger people who are drawn to our folkish message will be led astray down unproductive paths whether this be reviving 1930s Germany, obsessing about jews (who are given far too much credit for the cause of our decline) or viewing our Aryan past through 20th century westernised eyes.

The mythology of the Aryan (Proto-Indo-European) people was most clearly a solar mythology. It was solar, masculine and virile. The term virile is to be found in many Indo-European languages and can be traced back to the PIE *wehros. The term can be found in many of the writings of Baron Julius Evola (1898-1974). Let us read what Baron Evola has to say about the word:

"Vira is a term with the same Latin root vir, which does not describe an ordinary man (homo), but rather an eminent man. The term denotes a manly and 'heroic' nature (vira is sometimes used as a substitute for 'hero'), which is essentially determined by the rajas guna." (The Yoga of Power. Tantra, Shakti, and the Secret Way.)

The vira is thus a superior and virile man. He is dominant and has an inherent superiority over both weaker men and women. The vira has a special energy or force called viriya, derived from the same PIE root:

"For this reason, the texts speak also of a special strength beyond knowledge, of a 'superior and powerful energy' (viriya), which differs from the normal human energies and which alone works the miracle of 'liberation of the will by means of the will'; it provides the strength for endurance and allows of advance toward supreme liberation." (The Doctrine of Awakening. The Attainment of Self-Mastery according to the Earliest Buddhist Texts)

"According to the polyvalence of the technical terminology of Tantrism and hatha yoga, however, the same word virya can also designate the male seed, which in a more general context connects with the theory that  to man as such, owing to the simple fact of his manhood, or purushmatra sambandhibhih, has been granted the potential to attain the supernatural completion of himself." (Eros and the Mysteries of Love. The Metaphysics of Sex)

Now it should be obvious to the vast majority of my readers that the vira, an exceptional man is by necessity a tiny minority and indeed when one considers the abject state of 'manhood' today we see that the typical male is a metrosexual, devoid of masculine energy, a parody of man with his handbag, waxed hair, skin moisturiser, make up and obsession with showering every five minutes. The metrosexual is the marketing man's dream for he is void of race and to a large extent gender. More often than not he is also a product of the modern middle classes (the mercantile class) and has a university indoctrination, trained not to think independently but to chant the mantras of his puppet master. Not surprisingly the average 'white' male with his lack of masculinity is not attractive to the female of the race, who at the same time has been trained via the media (most notably television and sluttish women's magazines) and schooling to behave in a masculine way. She has been indoctrinated into falsely believing that she is the 'equal' of man, that she has the same capabilities which to my readers will no doubt be viewed as an absurdity and rightly so.

By contrast the unseen hand who is directing the media in the west is encouraging a masculine negro type to be the preferred mate of the Nordic woman. It is only the 'white' male who has been emasculated. I know of no other race which has been targeted by this pernicious propaganda. The negro and 'white' woman are now depicted as the intelligent and courageous ones whilst the 'white' male is portrayed as stupid and lacking in courage. If this were any other race or gender being targeted in this way there would be cries of 'racism' and 'sexism'.

The latest piece of insanity by the outgoing Prime Minister David Cameron in permitting women to become combat soldiers will no doubt damage the long term health of women and in some cases cause chaos in the trenches. Those female soldiers who are not given to sluttish behaviour or assuming that they are the equal (or even the superior) of man or are not lesbians (and there are plenty of those to be found in uniform) will be in my view, and it is only a personal opinion, a minority. Why any woman would wish to assume an occupation that is the preserve of a man as soldiering obviously is, is beyond my comprehension. Nature has developed the female to be the bearer of the race and her strength is in this capacity, something which few men would wish to undergo. By the government pursuing a policy of pushing more and more women into the labour market it is interfering with the dynamics of family life and is hell-bent on further devaluing the role of man as master of his hearth.

At this juncture let us examine the etymology of the word 'husband'. It is derived from Old English husbonda which in turn is derived from Old Norse husbondi which can be broken down into two separate elements; hus-'house' and bondi-'one who has a household'. So it is clear that our ancestors, both Christian and pre-Christian viewed the man as the master of the hearth, and not the woman. This is nature's way and it is or was OUR way until it was undermined in the 1960s.

No doubt my opponents will quote a handful of exceptions to this rule, namely female monarchs of the past but these women only rose to prominence due to the lack of a male heir or in times of dire necessity where typical roles assigned by gender may need to be temporarily deviated from. But these examples are only a handful and this should only apply in times of dire necessity. One only has to look at the occasions when women are handed supreme authority. I am thinking in particular of Elizabeth I, queen of England 1558-1601. She was like many queens, a tyrant who had no qualms about the shedding of blood, innocent or not. Mary I, queen of England 1553-1558 executed 300 protestants at the stake. We have the more recent examples of Margaret Thatcher, Prime Minister of the United Kingdom 1979-1990 who divided British society and destroyed the manufacturing base of the country, suppressing the miners' strike with great brutality. Now we have a second female Prime Minister in Theresa May who openly models herself on Thatcher-or at least encourages the comparison. She has said in Parliament that she would be ready to give the order to press the button that would unleash a nuclear holocaust and murder millions of innocent people. THIS is what happens when you place a woman in charge of an organisation or a country-they try to outman the men and appear more 'macho'. 

Man is no longer the master of his hearth, appearing to take the lead from television advertising he now wears a pinny and does the baking for his family when instead he should be the hunter-gatherer. It is the role of the wife to keep his household in order using the authority of her husband. This is why even today in debased marriage ceremonies where women are encouraged no longer to 'obey' their husbands, the father still gives away his daughter even when she has already been deflowered by the groom! It is an echo of recognition of the former authority of man over his household which includes his wife. For this reason in most western countries the wife and the children assume the surname of the man. It is an indication that they are his property.

This my readers is what society in the west is like in the 20th and 21st centuries but this should not be the way of those who subscribe to a folkish Weltanschauung. We must restore the correct relationship between males and females and restore the ancient Aryan order of caste.

Let us consider what Baron Evola has to say about this development:

"The emancipation of women was destined to follow that of the slaves and the glorification of people without a caste and without traditions, namely, the pariah. In a society that no longer understands the figure of the ascetic and of the warrior; in which the hands of the latest aristocrats seem better fit to hold tennis rackets or shakers for cocktail mixes than swords or sceptres; in which the archetype of the virile man is represented by a boxer or movie star if not by the dull wimp represented by the intellectual, the college professor, the narcissistic puppet of the artist, or the busy and dirty money-making banker and the politician-in such a society it was only a matter of time before women rose up and claimed for themselves a 'personality' and a 'freedom' according to the anarchist and individualist meaning usually associated with these words. And while traditional ethics asked men and women to be themselves to the utmost of their capabilities and express with radical traits their own gender-related characteristics-the new 'civilisation' aims at levelling everything since it is oriented to the formless and to a stage that is truly not beyond but on this side of the individuation and differentiation of the sexes." (Revolt Against the Modern World, )

Man must take the initiative in claiming his mastery over the hearth. Once again he must choose a suitable mate for his daughter, perhaps giving her a choice from a prearranged selection. By not doing so and instead trusting his daughter to make this decision herself (and thus ignoring the capricious nature of the female) he is abrogating his rights and responsibilities as a father. He is risking the pollution of his bloodline via either miscegenation or the mating with a man of inferior type such as a drunkard, alcoholic, a criminal or one who is workshy. Both men and women must once again understand that they are not the owners of our genes but their custodian. It thus behoves us to ensure that we fulfil the trust of our ancestors and future descendants.

Wednesday, July 13, 2016

Self-hating Austrian Government Seeking to Demolish Hitler's Childhood Home

https://www.rt.com/news/350820-hitler-house-nazi-austria/

So much for the so-called Austrian Peoples Party! Not content with outlawing genuine historical debate regarding the so-called 'holocaust' and deterring all opposition to their anti-German and pro-zionist agenda the German and Austrian governments are not above erasing any trace of the Third Reich, even going so far as to destroying graves (which should be held as sacred) and demolishing historic buildings. I hope they pay for their crimes against the Volk.


Sunday, July 10, 2016

Involution, Racial Degeneration and the Collapse of Traditional Aryan Society



I would conjecture that the majority of people who read this and my other blogs would be in agreement with the concept that we are witnessing a long period of involution, the reverse of evolution. The Collins Concise English Dictionary defines the term as :

"3. Zool. degeneration or structural deformation. 4. Biol. an involute formation or structure. 5. Physiol. reduction in size of an organ or part, as of the uterus following childbirth or as a result of ageing."

Mankind is currently going through a process of degeneration and has been for a long time. The races of man are involuting through racial decay and this is a significant aspect of what the Hindus call the Kali Yuga. Far from any evolution from occurring mankind is sinking back into a biological  morass, a human swamp. Some parts of the world are experiencing this negative process faster than others. The white world appears to be the only part of the world which is affected by racial decay. One does not see this to the same extent or hardly at all in the Orient, Asia or Africa. Indeed the only parts of the world where floods of immigrants are permitted to invade are Europe and the white or once primarily white countries of North America and Australasia. Why is this? Is it mere coincidence? Is it due to the apparent and perceived material wealth of the white world which is attracting this flotsam and jetsam? Is is due to refugees seeking shelter and safety from war? I believe that both are true but why do supposed refugees travel half way round the world for refuge when there are countries much closer to hand that can provide them with support? I believe that there is a sinister hand behind all of this which can be traced back to the hidden zionist masters who control the purse strings of the white world and line the pockets of its so-called democratically elected leaders and representatives who change their political stance on issues as often as others change their underpants. They change their stance no doubt to whore for votes from the masses but also because their financial backers tell them to do so.

The zionist cabal is hell bent on not only the financial exploitation of the western world which by the way (with the exception of brave and plucky Iceland) it achieved incredibly through the global banking crisis of 2008, but its destruction. Whole white populations are being turned into financially indebted wage slaves dependant on their capitalist exploiters for survival and too fearful to challenge never mind change the system because of the Orwellian 'hate laws' which have psychologically shackled the masses. The once white populations of the west are being flooded with immigrants, both legal and illegal, refugees and phony 'asylum seekers' all creating extra competition for jobs, housing, schooling and health. Thus not only has this rich cabal an expendable and expanding pool of cheap and compliant labour (note how Thatcher destroyed the power of the trade unions and thus the bargaining power of working people in the 1980s) but an ever growing mass of consumers which they can sell their expensive crap to. Thus whole populations (not just in the white world) are being transformed into wage slaves and consumers at the same time. The creation of mass media in the form of first newspapers, then radio, television and now the internet was instrumental in this process. Of themselves these things are not 'evil' but are nonetheless used for negative purposes by the establishment. However it is interesting that once these instruments of propaganda and indoctrination start to be used by opponents of global zionism there are howls of condemnation by the establishment and the old trick of demonisation of the enemy begins except instead of pointing the finger and crying "witch" we now have "racist", "anti-semite" and "hater". All terms used to silence and castrate opposition. In one recent meeting of the Labour party a Jewish MP was accused of "colluding with " a national newspaper and her accuser was immediately branded an "anti-semite" even though the issue of Judaism or the Jews had never even been brought up! See how easily and effectively criticism of the criminal regime of Israel, zionism or even Jewish politicians is silenced by the witch word of "anti-semite". Israel, zionism and Jews are now beyond criticism for fear of the accusing finger and the witch word. Complicit in all of this are the white self-hating liberal traitors who sit in parliament, falsely claiming to represent the very people who they are expoiting for the sake of money, power, influence, privilege or prestige. Westminster is truly a pigsty with more than its fair share of swine around the trough. 


In the mind of the zionist cabal the only effective opponent to their attempts at global domination was Aryan man and this is why their efforts have been directed against the white world but they have no intention of stopping there when we consider the efforts at destabalising the middle east by zionist American presidents and European leaders such as British prime ministers who are nothing other than pet poodles to Washington, Wall Street and Tel Aviv. There is a glimmer of hope in the white world: (apart from of course Iceland) we have Russia, a country which even now is still demonised not only by the west but by some white nationalists and even National Socialists who are blinded by the old and outdated rhetoric of 1930s Germany which saw the Slavs in some cases as being Untermenschen. Indeed this is underpinned by an incorrect etymology which associates the word Slav with slave. This faulty thinking must now be abandoned. The Russians are to a large extent an Aryan people (see Raciology, 2011 by Vladimir Avdeyev) and many exhibit very Nordic physical traits. They and they alone are the only European people who can and are withstanding the aggression of the zionist controlled west. They are a tough and fiercely proud people (which Hitler found to his cost). They are our last refuge and hope unless there is a dramatic reawakening in the west which is currently dying.

The other glimmer of hope outside of the Aryan world are the Oriental peoples, most notably the Chinese who again represent a last stand against global zionism. The Chinese in particular are a fairly racially pure people by contrast with the west.  Racial purity is not the preserve of the Aryan peoples who I may add are now the most mongrelised of peoples. Indeed I would go so far as to say that the most racially pure negro is of greater value than a mongrelised fat bellied, educationally challenged European! Watching supposed 'England' football 'fans' rioting in France recently was shameful and emphasised to me how the English folk have degenerated both biologically and in terms of behaviour. Whilst I am an Aryanist and a racialist I do not subscribe to hatred of other races: I merely wish to see our Nordic race (and other races) survive and pursue their own separate destinies! This is not race hate. It is the opposite: race love! This is true 'diversity'!

The problem of the western world is its adoption of the anti-values of the French revolution with its overthrow of an elite Nordic racial nobility and the introduction and emphasis on the concept of the equality of all men. The fact is that men are not and never have been 'equal'. Passing legislation by politicians elected by an inferior electorate does not reverse nature's laws. Mother Nature is concerned with the survival of the fittest in order that races and species improve or evolve rather than involute. Man on the other hand, particular deracialised western man is concerned with the downward involution of man. His ideals of 'equality' and 'democracy' are held to be inviable and 'self evident' truths! In short political liberalism has become a secular religion and those who oppose its anti-values are labelled as heretics and punished accordingly. There can be no deviation from the 'truths' preached in the free world. The latest example of western intolerance is the banning of the hijab and burka in various European countries such as France, Belgium, the Netherlands, Bulgaria, Switzerland and certain parts of Spain and Italy. So much for 'tolerance'! Yet these very same governments will superficially and hypocritically stand in support of their muslim communities!

Multiculturalism and by extension multiracialism has failed in the west. It has not become the melting pot hoped for by the zionists and white traitors. Instead European countries have become balkanised. So now the multicultural experiment has been abandoned but instead emphasis is being given to integration which is nothing other than the entrenchment of the multiracial society but with a mono culture, a descralised western democratic liberal culture which is the modern face of Marxism in the 21st century-and just as intolerant. Western media, particularly in the form of advertising now pushes the multiracial agenda with every advert featuring not only non-whites but mixed race 'families'. This drip drip effect helps to normalise that which should not be normal in the eyes of the masses, especially the white masses. The multiracial family is now viewed as the standard or the norm and something that whites, especially white women should aspire to and here we have the weak link-woman. Feminism is a product of the anti-values of the French revolution and it has resulted in the passing of legislation over the last 100 years in the west which effectively gave 'equal rights' to women. In fact in many ways women seem to have more 'rights' than men when one considers the iniquitous state of the divorce laws. Man has effectively become emasculated when in fact he should be master of his own hearth.

The latest piece of lunancy which is the brainchild of military chiefs and David Cameron is the lifting of the ban on women becoming combat soldiers. Now I  am not maintaining that women are weak-far from it. The very fact that nature has chosen woman to give birth to babies rather than man is an indication that women in some ways are stronger. However in terms of physiology and biology man is stronger and hardier than woman. This is a fact of nature and cannot be changed by legislation. By allowing women to become combat soldiers in effect a death sentence is being passed on their long term health, their ability to reproduce and a whole Pandora's box has been opened. Instead of fighting in the trenches we now have the prospect of other things happening in the trenches with the chaos and rampant lack of discipline which will ensue from this. Only as a last resort and as a means of national survival should women be permitted to fight. I cannot understand why any normal woman would wish to become a soldier, why any normal woman would want to kill other human beings. Is there an element of hatred of men in this? We do know that a significant number of female soldiers are lesbians and very butch ones at that (not the kind that appear in Gentlemens' periodicals). The whole process defeminises woman, not just physically but mentally and spiritually as well. In fact this is a crime against woman.

Our ancestors realised that men and women have very different roles to perform and that this is necessary for the formation and maintenance of any physically, mentally and spiritually healthy society. Man is divided into two genders for a reason and that reason is for the reproduction of the race to which we belong. The creation of a society in the west which gives equal employment rights to women despite the very different capabilities of men and women results in more and more women being taken out of the home and placed in offices, shops and factories. In effect they have become wage slaves like men. Moreoever they are encouraged to want to be a wage slave. There is nothing worse than being tied to a job which you hate but the government are increasingly opposed to anyone not working regardless of whether they are financially independent or not because they want us all to be enslaved to the economy, never retire and in effect become or remain serfs. Thankfully I am now retired and no longer suffer the indignity of 'work'. I am not decrying work in the context of meaningful activity but being a wage slave, having a 'job' is not natural to our folk. Our ancestors prior to the Industrial Revolution in the 18th and 19th centuries lived in agricultural communities where they engaged in meaningful labour and trade. They lived healthier lives and were valued for the genuine work that they carried out which was for the survival of the entire community which was village based and centred around interrelated clans. The concept of having a 'job' is a relatively modern one which is the product of the Industrial Revolution which caused the atomisation of European man and his cutting off from the natural environment and the rhythms of nature.  So work should not be equated with having a job!

Until a woman was given in marriage to her husband who I may add was selected by her father, she remained under the care and jurisdiction of the head of the household which was always the father unless he had died. This is why a father 'gives away' his daughter even in modern marriage ceremonies. After her marriage the woman came under the care and jurisdiction of her husband which by the way is derived from the Old Norse word húsbóndi which means 'master of the house'. The term can be broken down into hús, 'house' and bóndi, 'occupier and tiller of the soil.' Unfortunately today with the breakdown of the natural order of traditional society women no longer have their husbands chosen for them by their fathers and this leads to the consequent faulty choosing of mates based on irrational emotions and increasingly by the undue pressure of the media which encourages women to race-mix and choosing a husband of one's own race is viewed as 'racist'! By contrast a woman's father has only the best interests of his daughter at heart and would therefore choose the best possible husband for her rather than rely on fleeting emotions and the caprcious nature of women. By doing so the father ensures the continuity and racial value of his line.

The Bhagavid Gita makes it very clear where the origins of the breakdown of the natural order, the collapse of caste and race are to be found:

"Out of the corruption of women proceeds the confusion of castes; out of the confusion of castes proceeds the loss of memory, out of the loss of memory proceeds the loss of understanding, and out of this all evil." (1:41)

Likewise the Book of Sajaha prophesied:

"Customs will no longer be enforced, but vice will be fashionable. Men will have sexual intercourse with boys and go unpunished; women will no longer want to be women, but will behave like men and go unpunished; people will mix themselves with animals and go unpunished and father bastards. And the bastards of bastards will be countless in the streets of the cities without anyone eradicating them." (Tablet 12, 2nd Chapter,11, my translation)

Rampant homosexuality along with its approval and legalisation by the state, the racial mixing found in the cities and the reversal of the sexes are indications that we are indeed living in the Kali Yuga. Indeed Julius Evola termed this as the regression of the castes in his Revolt against the Modern World (1934).

Sunday, July 03, 2016

Some Thoughts Regarding the EU Referendum




The events of the last 9 days or so in the United Kingdom have brought about what appears to be seismic changes in the political landscape in these islands. We have witnessed a clear majority decision by the electorate to leave the embryonic European superstate that has been in formation since 1950 with the founding of the European Cold and Steel Community by Germany, France, Belgium, Luxembourg, the Netherlands and Italy. In the 1957 with the Treaty of Rome this became the European Economic Community. On 1/1/73 the United Kingdom joined the club and by this time it consisted of 9 countries, Greece becoming the 10th country to join in 1981. At this time I was an avid student of biblical prophecy. I like many other people saw significance in the fact that this was now a 10 country 'empire' and considered this to be a fulfillment of biblical prophecy.

"And there appeared another wonder in heaven; and behold a great red dragon, having seven heads and ten horns, and seven crowns upon his heads." (Revelation 12:3, KJV)

"And I stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a beast rise up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns, and upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of blasphemy." (Revelation 13:1, KJV)

Now I am not intending to go into any great detail about this prophecy, for my reason for quoting these two important biblical references was to illustrate my mindset at the time for I considered that this 10 horned dragon would produce the Antichrist spoken of in both the Old and New Testaments. I spent many years studying these prophecies, devouring many books on the subject. Of course I am no longer a Christian as I have returned to the spiritual path of my ancestors but that does not make these prophecies invalid for contained within the Bible are certain truths which have their origins in Aryan belief systems. Both the Jews and the Christian Church were notorious plagiarists of other religious and spiritual systems, most notably Aryan ones.

Now over the passing decades it became clear that the EEC which became the European Union in 1993 was not to stop at 10 countries! However prophecies contained in the book of Daniel (chapter 7) indicate that this organisation has its origins in the Roman Empire. It is significant that of the first 12 nations to join the EEC, 10 were were once part of this empire but it should be noted that Germany was only partly within its boundaries. Denmark and Ireland were not part of the empire but the other 10 were. It is interesting that the EU (which denies that it is currently a superstate) has both a flag and an anthem as well as a single currency which the majority of EU countries are part of, the Euro. If this is not a superstate then it begs the question what is? But going back to the flag; it is interesting that although the EU currently has 28 members the stars on the flag stopped at 12! You may wonder what is the significance of this apparent piece of trivia? According to the EU:


"The European flag symbolises both the European Union and, more broadly, the identity and unity of Europe.
It features a circle of 12 gold stars on a blue background. They stand for the ideals of unity, solidarity and harmony among the peoples of Europe.
The number of stars has nothing to do with the number of member countries, though the circle is a symbol of unity."

This is a clever deception. We know that between 1986 and 1994 the EU did consist of 12 member states but this is not  the origin of the 12. The true origin is revealed in Revelation 12:1-2:

"And there appeared a great wonder in heaven; a woman clothed with the sun, and the moon under her feat, and upon her head a crown of twelve stars: and she being with child cried, travailing in birth, and pained to be delivered. (KJV)

The red dragon and the woman clothed with the sun with the moon under her feet and the crown with 12 stars all appear to be competing symbolism if we take Revelation at face value which of course we cannot for it is a hopeless jumble and mish mash like all of the Bible. What appears to be competing symbolism is in fact two sides of the same coin. This is reflected in the political and so-called 'democratic' systems of the west where we appear to be given choice in elections (and referenda) but in reality both players are puppets of the same unseen zionist hand. The woman with the 12 stars and the red dragon are all judeo-christian symbols which have been implanted in the Collective Unconscious of peoples. An example of this of course is the red dragon of the flag of Wales, which is representative of the judeo-christian worldview which is at enmity with the Aryan worldview represented by the English Germanic white dragon. My regular readers will understand what I am referring to here. I will address the issue of the symbolism of the number 12 in a future article.

I feel that the decision of the English (and Welsh) people to leave the European superstate is highly significant in spiritual terms for it is a rejection of the zionist worldview and zionist political and economic enslavement. This is a remarkable result when one considers the establishment propaganda, the downright utters lies and fear that the EU puppet politicians sought to influence the electorate with. This is a slap in face for the zionist puppet masters. Now I realise that this in itself does not constitute a racial or folkish awakening but it is significant that some of the more knuckle dragging elements of the population have interpreted it in this way and engaged in illegal acts (which this writer does not endorse). There is now a political vacuum which can and should be exploited.

I also consider it significant that apart from Scotland, Northern Ireland and London (where most of the immigrants and chattering classes live) the majority of the electorate voted to 'leave'. The only people by and large who did not vote this way are the Scots, immigrants and middle class supporters of the zionist regime of Westminster and Brussels. Of the young people who supposedly voted to 'remain' the majority of them are middle class supporters of the status quo who care nothing for true democracy, the rights of the folk to govern themselves or to protect our borders from invasion (which is what immigration constitutes). A significant number of these are white self-haters, traitors to their race and folk. By comparison the average 'working class' white English voter voted in huge numbers to 'leave'. He is not indoctrinated by years of university 'education' and has no stake in the current system which has turned him into an indebted wage slave, effectively castrated by the establishment and forbidden to express his discontent with the ongoing invasion of his country and the resultant genocide of his race that immigation causes-a situation he was never asked to give his consent to. No wonder there is so much anger!

It is more than likely that a second Scottish referendum will ensue and I would not be surprised that the result this time will be different and that the Scots will vote to leave the United Kingdom despite the bribing of the Scottish population at the expense of the English population (the so-called iniquitous Barnett Formula) since the late 1970s. An England freed from the burden of Scotland (and Northern Ireland) would be free to determine its own future and this would hopefully result in an increased awareness and resurgence of the Germanic racial identity of the English folk.

An interesting proposal has been put forwarded but hardly discussed in the establishment controlled western media is the Arctic Triangle. You will find hardly anything said about this in the west for the establishment does not want you to know. The proposal is that the United Kingdom join Iceland,  Norway, Greenland and the Faroe Islands in a Nordic Triangle trading block. This would also help to re-establish the Nordic racial idenity of the English folk.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brexit-uk-eu-referendum-latest-iceland-norway-greenland-faroe-islands-a7105641.html

https://www.rt.com/business/349008-iceland-uk-northern-union/