Wednesday, May 16, 2012

The Cancer of Feminisation in the Aryan World





The root sickness that currently pervades Aryan society in the `western world` is the feminisation of Aryan man, his emasculation and the rise of the `new man`, the cosmopolitan, metrosexual, handag carrying, make up wearing, gelled hair, sandal-wearing, daily shower taking excuse for a `man`.
Not only has the modern white-collar worker become emasculated in appearance and behaviour, not only is he manipulated with impunity by woman but the whole society in which he finds himself is dominated not so much by women but by the feminising influence of woman.
The rot set in with the granting of the electoral franchise to women. For the first time policians in the western parliamentary democracies had to take into account the views and opinions of women but the statesman of yore became the political whore of today where he will prostitute himself for a few thousand votes in order to maintain his position on the gravy train.
The feminisation of society and the emasculation of man`s world can be traced back to this event. Screeching feminists once they had obtained the vote then went on to demand `equality`[whatever that means] with men. They wished to exchange their Gods-given feminimity to become a type of inferior man: to become wage slaves.
They demanded the right of divorce on demand, equal pay and inheritance rights. They exchanged their womanhood for a few shekels or a pound of flesh in the divorce courts.
Today we do not hear so much of the feminists of the 1960s and 70s because they have largely achieved their goals and in many respects women now have more `rights` and influence than men.
This feminising influence can be seen at work in the way that modern Aryan man feels that he is under pressure to `dig deep` for the parasites of the African and Asian world, to spend his meagre wealth on `charity` or materialism-"keeping up with the Jones`s".
One sign of a feminised world is the desire for `safety` or `security` and the over-regulation of everyday matters. The Aryan hero cannot breath in such a world-it is stifling!
Often this materialistic pressure comes from the women around him. He is apt to feel wretched unless he cares for the unfortunates of this world.
He is in other words a sorry excuse for a `man`. He is less than a man. Such a miserable creature has no place in the struggle for existence. And likewise such a race has no place on this earth unless it is prepared to fight-literally fight for its existence.
To spend your wealth on supporting other races is akin to spitting on your children`s children. Other races and peoples are in competition with us for scarce resources and for the right to exist. Not only must we as individuals and as a race struggle to exist we must struggle for supremacy. For without a strong Will to Power we deserve to perish as perish we may!
Aryan man become men again and grow some bloody balls!

Sunday, May 13, 2012

Ancient Prehistoric Thor`s Hammer?





Taken from the Historic Mysteries website.



In June 1936 (or 1934 by some accounts), Max Hahn (1897-1989) and his wife Emma were hiking along Red Creek near London, Texas. It was there that they discovered an artifact which seemed completely out of place. What they found was a unique piece of wood protruding from a rock concretion. When the rock was broken by their son in 1947, it revealed an iron hammer with a wooden handle. The artifact would gain the world’s attention when Carl Baugh, a Creationist, purchased the artifact in 1983. The London Hammer, or the London Artifact as some call it, was promoted by Baugh as a monumental ‘Pre-Flood’ discovery. Additional curiosity was generated when a 1985 report from the Creation Ex Nihile dated the rock formation encompassing the hammer as 400-500 million years old.

The Hammer is six inches (15.24cm) long with a diameter of one inch. The metal has been identified as consisting of 96.6% iron, 2.6% chlorine, and 0.74% sulfur. Believers point out that this hammer has not rusted since its discovery over sixty years ago. This is certainly a unique blend of metalurgy which some claim be a lost technology of ancient man.

So the mystery begins. What is a hammer doing embedded in such ancient rock and what does this mean about the age of mankind since man was not suppose to exist for a few hundred million years?

As with any mystery and grand claim, all the evidence needs to be presented before the truth can finally be revealed. The discovery of the London Hammer still leaves us with a lot of questions. And there are many inconsistencies that prevent the scientific community from confirming this find as the oldest known artifact created by man.

First of all, there are conflicting reports as to where the object was actually located in the surrounding rocks. And there is no photographic evidence of the object prior to being disturbed. One report states that the hammer was embedded in a rock formation dating from the Cretaceaus Period (65-135 million years ago). But other accounts state that Mr. Hahn found the hammer bearing nodule “near” these surrounding rocks.

Skeptics argue that minerals could have cemented the hammer around the Cretaceous rock after it was dropped or left behind. This could easily lead novice geologists to believe that the hammer and the rock formation are from the same time period.

The only true method of determining the age of the hammer is through Carbon 14 dating of the wooden handle, but Baugh has yet to authorize this procedure. The handle appears to be partially fossilized, so this certainly adds to the argument that this a very ancient tool. But fossilization can occur prematurely through various natural methods.

To skeptics, the hammer appears to be a tool that was abandoned or lost some 200 years ago, but to it’s supporters, this is a clear indication that man has been on this Earth much longer than previously thought.

The artifact is currently located at the “Creation Evidence Museum“.

Thursday, May 10, 2012

L.A. Waddell and Egyptian Civilization. Its Sumerian Origin and Real Chronology





For a number of years now I have gained an appreciation of the works of Professor L.A. Waddell and in particular his Egyptian Civilization. Its Sumerian Origin and Real Chronology in which he provides uncontestable proofs of the Sumerian origin of Egyptian civilization, so-called `Egyptian` hieroglyphics and the pre-dynastic and first dynasty of Pharaohs and by extension their Indo-European origins.
He skillfully identifies through his decipherment of the Indo-Sumerian seals and his comparison between their inscriptions with those of the Indo-Aryan king lists and Sumerian and Egyptian chronicles that Pharaoh Menes is identical with Manis-Tusu,son of Sargon the Great,Manasyu of India and King Minos of Crete, a great Aryan world emperor.
Professor Waddell`s work is unfortunately largely ignored by the academics, not because of lack of evidence or inherent logic but because his racial interpretation of ancient history has become an anathema since the end of WWII.
Since the discovery that the family of Tutankhamun have European DNA and the suppression of this fact by scientists and the Egyptian establishment it is time that this scholar`s works were revisited with an open mind.

Wednesday, May 02, 2012

Sons of Surt are Approaching





Hearken ye sons of Hama! Hearken to the voice of the son of Veleda!
I see on the horizon the coming of the sons of Surt, that black faced leader of the southern hordes. Indeed he is already here and he brings his hordes of destruction with him. They are surrounding Walhalla; they have no shame these sons of Surt.
The time of Ragnarok-Korangar approaches. Are you ready sons of Hama, noble offspring of Rig? Are you ready, noble Einheriar to fight at All-Father`s command when Hama blows Gjallarhorn? To your swords and shields and our Gods go with us!
The strawdeath of shame awaits the coward of ignoble blood.

Sunday, April 22, 2012

Paganism To Be Taught in Schools

Taken from the Mail Online website: Paganism has been included in an official school religious education syllabus for the first time. Cornwall Council has told its schools that pagan beliefs, which include witchcraft, druidism and the worship of ancient gods such as Thor, should be taught alongside Christianity, Islam and Judaism. The requirements are spelled out in an agreed syllabus drawn up by Cornwall’s RE advisory group. Faiths: Schoolchildren in Cornwall will soon be studying pagan religions like druidism, above, and witchcraft Required learning: Schoolchildren in Cornwall will soon be studying pagan religions like druidism, above, and witchcraft It says that from the age of five, children should begin learning about standing stones, such as Stonehenge. At the age of 11, pupils can begin exploring ‘modern paganism and its importance for many in Cornwall’. The syllabus adds that areas of study should include ‘the importance of pre-Christian sites for modern pagans’. More... Call for return of compulsory language GCSEs for every child to help the economy And an accompanying guide says that pupils should ‘understand the basic beliefs’ of paganism and suggests children could discuss the difficulties a practising pagan pupil might face in school. But the council’s initiative has dismayed some Christian campaigners, who are alarmed that a religion once regarded as a fringe eccentricity is increasingly gaining official recognition. Critics point out that according to the council’s own estimates there are only between 600 and 750 pagans in Cornwall out of a total population of 537,400. Mike Judge, Christian Institute spokesman, said: ‘Religious education is squeezed already – there’s barely enough time to cover Christianity and the other major religions. 'Introducing paganism is just faddish and has more to do with the political correctness of teachers than the educational needs of children.’ Spells: Cornish witches Cassandra Latham-Jones, left, and partner Laetitia Spells: Cornish witches Cassandra Latham-Jones, left, and partner Laetitia However, Neil Burden, the council’s cabinet member for children’s services, said that the move would give children ‘access to the broad spectrum of religious beliefs’. The council said the teaching of Christianity still accounted for nearly two-thirds of religious education in its schools. Paganism encompasses numerous strands, from druids, who believe themselves to be practitioners of the ancient faith of pre-Christian Britain, to wiccans – modern witches who gather in covens – and shamans, who engage with the spirit of the land. Cornish pagans include witches Cassandra and Laetitia Latham-Jones, who dress in robes, own broomsticks and a black cat and cast spells. Their website says they offer baby blessings, psychic house cleansings and spells to suit particular situations. Cornwall Council’s initiative follows the 2010 decision by the Charity Commission to recognise druidism as a religion. Jailed druids and pagans are also now allowed to take twigs or ‘magic wands’ into their cells, although they are barred from wearing a hooded robe. According to the 2001 national census, there are about 40,000 pagans in England and Wales, though some estimate that the true figure is now far higher. Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2129821/And-double-maths--paganism-Schools-told-witchcraft-druids-RE-syllabus.html#ixzz1smLGipVm

Friday, April 13, 2012

Adolf Hitler`s Grandchild Speaks Out!


Taken from the Daily Mail website dated 7/4/12.

Philippe Loret and his six siblings were sitting around the dining room table chatting about everyday things when their father, Jean-Marie, broke the news.

‘Suddenly my father said, “Kids, I’ve got something to tell you. Your grandfather is Adolf Hitler,” ’ explains Philippe. ‘There was stunned silence as no one knew what to say. We didn’t know how to react.’

That was 40 years ago, yet there is a sense that Philippe, 56, still doesn’t know how to react. He has never spoken out about that conversation or the fact he may be the grandson of the most infamous dictator in history. A former plumber for the French air force, he has kept it a secret from all but his closest friends, never telling his colleagues or even his partner’s family.

This is the first time Philippe has talked publicly about his ancestry and he has agreed to do so only in the light of new evidence backing up his father’s story.
Hitler's grandson? Philippe Loret, 56, has two portraits of the Fuhrer hanging on the wall of his home in Saint Quentin in Picardy, northern France

Hitler's grandson? Philippe Loret, 56, has two portraits of the Fuhrer hanging on the wall of his home in Saint Quentin in Picardy, northern France

Last month Alan Wilkes, the son of Royal Engineer Leonard Wilkes, one of the first soldiers to land on the Normandy beaches on D-Day, released an entry from his father’s diary that appeared to corroborate Jean-Marie’s assertion that he was Hitler’s illegitimate son.

On September 30, 1944, Leonard wrote: ‘An interesting day today. Visited the house where Hitler stayed as a corporal in the last war, saw the woman who had a baby by him and she told us that the baby, a son, was now fighting in the French army against the Germans.’

Mr Wilkes came forward after reading new information that adds weight to Jean-Marie’s belief he was conceived during a brief relationship between his French mother, Charlotte Lobjoie, and Hitler, a young German corporal fighting in northern France in the summer of 1917.


More...

The two Churchills who defeated Hitler: TV historian David Starkey reveals how an ancestor inspired Winston to win the war
Armed Neo-Nazis who are 'prepared' for violence are patrolling Trayvon’s hometown to ‘guard against race riots’

The story of Hitler’s secret lovechild has divided historians for decades. Jean-Marie died in 1985, aged 67, but two months ago, in Paris’s Le Point magazine, his lawyer, Francois Gibault, revealed compelling evidence to support his claims.

Tests prove Jean-Marie had the same blood type as Hitler and similar handwriting. Hitler had no official children and never acknowledged or met Jean-Marie. But German army papers show that officers took envelopes of cash to Charlotte during the Second World War. When she died, Jean-Marie found paintings in her attic signed by Hitler, while in Germany a picture of a woman painted by Hitler looked exactly like Charlotte.

Most striking of all, however, was the astonishing resemblance... a resemblance that Philippe undoubtedly shares. It is there in the familiar dimpled chin, the square jaw and piercing eyes. Philippe insists he is not proud of his apparent link to Hitler, but admits he is not unhappy about it either.
Hitler's son? The similarities between Jean-Marie Loret (pictured) and Hitler are striking

Hitler's son? The similarities between Jean-Marie Loret (pictured) and Hitler are striking
Dictator: Did Hitler conceive a love child in France during the First World War?

Dictator: Did Hitler conceive a love child in France during the First World War?

There is something vaguely unsettling about the way he sweeps his hair into the same side parting and has a moustache, something most people would avoid were they said to be related to Hitler.

And on entering his spacious one-bedroom flat in the sleepy town of Saint-Quentin in Picardy, northern France, one’s eyes are inevitably drawn to two portraits of the Fuhrer on the wall, incongruously placed either side of an oil painting of a vase of flowers.

In all other respects, the flat is cosy, with warm yellow walls and antique furniture. Philippe’s partner, Veronique, 46, a school caretaker, bustles around, chatting and making pots of tea. They met shortly after Philippe’s wife, Rosalyn, died in 1991; they had three children.

Veronique clearly adores Philippe, who is currently off work with a heart condition, and says the fact he may be Hitler’s grandson makes no difference at all. She, like Philippe, believes the claims are true.

For his part, Philippe remains strangely unperturbed by the fact he could be a direct descendant of the man responsible for the death camps and the Holocaust.

Speaking calmly and quietly, while chain-smoking Belgian cigars, Philippe says: ‘I believe I am Hitler’s grandson. Of course I am. The evidence is there. If people don’t believe it, that’s their problem.

‘My father told me. My mother is still alive and also believes it. He is part of my family, that’s why I have him on the wall. Hitler is my family. It’s not my fault that I ended up as his grandson or that all the things happened during the war. What he did has nothing to do with me. He will always be family for me.

‘When I was first told, all I was interested in was girls, and so I didn’t think about it too much. I knew who Hitler was – I studied him at school – but I did not tell any of my school friends. My private life had nothing to do with them.

‘I married Rosalyn in 1977 when she was 19 and I was 21. She did not want to accept it at first, but then she became used to it. Veronique first found it difficult to accept too, but she does not mind it because she loves me.’

In contrast to Philippe’s sanguine approach – he has read more than 40 books on Hitler, met the daughter of Himmler and claims to have spoken to one of the dictator’s mistresses – Jean-Marie struggled with the knowledge left to him by his mother.

Philippe says: ‘By the time my father told us about Hitler being his father, he was proud of being Hitler’s son. He had trouble accepting it at first. He didn’t like this fact, but gradually he came to terms with it.’

In 1981 Jean-Marie wrote a book, Your Father’s Name Was Hitler, in which he recounted the story his mother had told him when he was in his 20s. Charlotte said he had been conceived during a ‘tipsy’ evening with Hitler in June 1917.

She said she had enjoyed a brief relationship with the Fuhrer when he was on leave in the town of Fournes-in-Weppe near Lille. It was an unlikely match. She was 16, Hitler was 28; he couldn’t speak French, she couldn’t speak German.

The couple would go walking but Charlotte told Jean-Marie: ‘These walks usually ended badly. In fact, your father, inspired by nature, launched into speeches which I did not really understand. He did not speak French, but ranted in German, talking to an imaginary audience.’
Charlotte Lobjoie
A painting of Charlotte Lobjoi by a young Adolf Hitler

Love mystery: Charlotte Lobjoie (left) and a painting said to be of her by a young Hitler (right)

Philippe says: ‘My father told me the relationship lasted for only a few months. Hitler came under gas attack and went back to Germany to recover. He came back again for a few months and left again for Germany, and she never saw him again.

‘My father said Hitler was a good lover and was gentle with my grandmother. But apparently he was a jealous person and did not like other men giving her the eye. As far as I know he never had any sexual perversions – I don’t want to make him more than the monster he is.’

According to Philippe, Hitler painted Charlotte and he has a copy of a picture believed to be her. Published here for the first time, it shows her in the hayfields with a scarf over her head to protect her from the sun and a pitchfork in her hand. The painting has a signature, said to be that of Hitler, with the date 1916 below it. It was once owned by an art collector in the Belgian city of Ypres but has now been sold to another private collector.

Jean-Marie was born on March 25, 1918, in Seboncourt, 12 miles north of St Quentin. The shame of having an illegitimate son drove Charlotte away and she left for Paris, abandoning her newborn son to her parents. A birth certificate for Jean-Marie Loret records him as the ‘natural son’ of Miss Lobjoie.
'I don't think evil passes on. What he did has nothing to do with me'

According to Philippe, his father had an unhappy childhood; his grandfather often beat him, partly for being illegitimate. But he claims Hitler became aware of his son and made plans to look after him. At the age of eight, after his grandmother died, Jean-Marie was adopted by a local wealthy family called the Frizons, who were devout Catholics.

Philippe says: ‘This adoption was arranged by a local nun called Sister Theodosie, who knew Hitler. Apparently, she did this at Hitler’s request.’ According to Jean-Marie’s autobiography, Sister Marie Theodosie was a German nun who ran a clinic in St Quentin where Charlotte gave birth.

It is not known how Sister Theodosie knew Hitler but shortly after the Frizons took Jean-Marie in, the head of the family, Fernand Frizon, visited Frankfurt where he somehow managed to become the owner of a large building without paying any money for it. A year later, Mr Frizon sold the building and used the money to pay for Jean-Marie’s education.

Although Charlotte gave up her son for adoption, Philippe says they were reunited in Paris during the occupation of France, which began in May 1940. He also says German officers tracked her down to her address in Paris and used to hand her money.

Philippe says: ‘My father was re-acquainted with his mother by German officers during the Occupation. He even spent a week living with her at her apartment. That’s when she told him his father was Hitler, not on her death-bed as some have reported.

‘My father told me he heard from his mother how German soldiers used to bring her money on a regular basis. It didn’t help her to become rich, but she lived on it.’
The birth certificate of Jean-Marie , the alleged love child. He was born in 1918 in Seboncourt near St Quentin

The birth certificate of Jean-Marie , the alleged love child. He was born in 1918 in Seboncourt near St Quentin

Charlotte died in 1951 and Jean-Marie spent the next 20 years denying the secret she had left him with. In 1954 he divorced his wife Jacqueline, whom he had met in 1940. The couple had three children. Within months he married 19-year-old Muguette Dubecq, Philippe’s mother. The couple moved to Provins, a town west of Paris, where Jean-Marie worked in a glass manufacturing company. They would go on to have five daughters and two sons.

Philippe says: ‘Growing up I knew that my grandparents had died but I always thought they were French. I always thought that I was French. Every now and then at home, I would hear my father say how the Germans were far more disciplined than the French, but that was it.’

Philippe trained as a plumber and worked at a French air base, Cazaux, near Bordeaux, for 34 years. He and his wife Rosalyn had two sons and a daughter and he now has six grandchildren. Although he claims his children do not mind the connection to Hitler, they have not told their own children.

Philippe says: ‘They have not been told that their great-great-grandfather was Hitler. We don’t want them picked on at school. Some people find it difficult. My partner Veronique kept it a secret from her father for as long as he was alive, because he was born in 1938, and he grew up malnourished and was ill all his life as a result of the Second World War.

‘He would not have accepted her daughter’s partner being related to Hitler. Veronique’s mother now knows about me being Hitler’s grandson but does not accept it. She does not talk about it.’

Philippe does not believe in the concept of an evil gene and is not worried about the future of his children or his grandchildren. He says: ‘No, it has not had an effect on me. I don’t think evil passes on. Of course qualities from your parents pass on to you, but you build your own life and you make it what it is.

‘I’ve been a law-abiding French citizen all my life. I learned that from my family. I am not a bad person, and what he did had nothing to do with me. It was another time. We weren’t there when all this happened. Maybe the people around him manipulated him to do all the nasty things. Maybe he was not even aware that such nasty things were happening.
'I started to read Mein Kampf but gave up. It was too complicated'

‘What Hitler did to the Jews was wrong. But some of the things Hitler did were admirable – he brought Germany back from collapse after the Treaty of Versailles. He built the country up with roads and highways.’

Philippe says he is apolitical yet he clearly retains a fascination with Hitler and the Nazis. He says: ‘I read Mein Kampf but gave up after a few pages. It was too complicated. But on its philosophy, I don’t agree.

‘When we were growing up, we never discussed politics in our house. I’ve always voted but I won’t say who I vote for. I would now say that my politics is slightly right of centre, but not extreme right.’

After his father died in 1985, Philippe travelled to Munich and met the daughter of Heinrich Himmler, the head of the SS who co-ordinated the extermination of the Jews. He will not name the daughter but it is believed to be Gudrun Burwitz, now 81.

He says: ‘She believed I was Hitler’s grandson, because she had heard of him having a French son living in France from her own circle. This means that his inner circle knew about him having a secret son.’

Philippe also claims he met one of Hitler’s mistresses on the same trip. Historians have always believed the Fuhrer had only two mistresses, Eva Braun and Geli Raubal. Raubal died in 1931 and Braun died with Hitler in his bunker at the end of the war.

If Philippe is correct it means there was a third mistress whom no one knew about and who lived at least until the mid Eighties. Philippe says they met in Berchtesgaden, 100 miles south-east of Munich, and were introduced through Himmler’s daughter.

He says: ‘Historians are wrong, they don’t know everything. Hitler had more than two mistresses. The woman I met was Hitler’s mistress. I won’t name her as she has left behind a son, not Hitler’s, but for his sake I won’t identify her. But she told me that Hitler was a gentle lover and a good lover, just like my grandmother said.’

It is a strange way to talk about the man who perpetrated such evil, but Philippe says: ‘My father did not need to defend him. He was proud of being Hitler’s son.’

A pride, it would seem, shared by Philippe, despite his claims to the contrary.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2126591/Philippe-Loret-believes-Adolf-Hitlers-grandson-French-plumber-tells-family-story.html#ixzz1rwaUBoGI

Wednesday, April 04, 2012

Bastardisation of British Culture and Diarmaid MacCulloch


Once again the BBC[Bastardisation of British Culture Corporation] strikes again with a three part series undermining the very roots of ethnic English identity-How God Made the English. I did not see the previous two episodes. Watching episode 3 last night-A White and Christian People was more than enough for me.
This entire episode undermined-deliberately in my view the very identity of the English folk and if this had been done to any other people there would have been shouts of `racism`. The BBC just cannot help themselves. As readers of this blog will know I recently carried out a criticism of the absolutely appalling and multi-racial distortion of the King Arthur myth. The BBC love to spend English and British taxpayers` money on picking away at the English folk and the Aryan race.
This time they chose someone with a Scottish surname and Irish forename with self-confessed French Huguenot descent on his mother`s side to explore and determine what it means to be English.
In this episode MacCulloch was totally dismissive and snearingly contemptuous of the notion that the English are an ethnic group. He briefly used genetics, archaeology and ancient history-subjects which he clearly knows nothing about to question and dismiss the concept that there ever was an English ethnic group. MacCulloch may have a degree in history but clearly this could not have covered the Anglo-Saxon period. Showing his ignorance for this period he takes at face the value the account in the Anglo-Saxon Chronicles that the Germanic tribes arrived in 449CE in just "three longships", calculating that each ship carried 50 people, using this as `evidence` that there never was a full scale Germanic migration to Britain. What he then fails to mention-either through sheer ignorance or willful distortion is that this initial incursion was merely the arrival of a warrior band, a Maennerbund or Comitatus if you prefer the Latin expression. Subsequent to the arrival and rebellion of the Germanics under Hengest and Horsa a full scale invasion began over the next 100 years or so as the archaeological evidence from England and northern Europe testifies to. But clearly MacCulloch finds the truth too distasteful for his Franco-Celtic tastes because that would mean that he is not truly an Englishman.
I myself am less than 50% English as my followers will know but I would never distort English history to claim a greater stake amongst the English folk than I actually am entitled to.
During the making of the programme both his Y-Chromosone and Mitochondrial DNA were tested and he was declared by Stephen Oppenheimer[an Ashkenazi Jewish surname] to be an "average" or typical inhabitant of England. Did MacCulloch bother to tell Oppenheimer of his Scottish and French ancestry? Therefore MacCulloch`s genetic ancestry is of little value to the programme being himself a descendant of non-English people. His Y-Chromosone DNA could never reflect Germanic ancestry as his paternal line is Gaelic! Therefore this `evidence` should not have been admitted to support his `case` against English identity.
The start of the programme focussed briefly on the legend of St George and having smugly demolished the notion that the historical George was not an Englishman he then used this as a springboard to launch his attack on the very concept of our racial and ethnic identity. He made no mention at all about the Germanic concept of the dragon slayer and how this ancient archetype would have made the English receptive to George.
Throughout this programme he consistently projected his clearly multiracial and multicultural views back on to the recent and ancient past to justify his own political[political with a small `p`] agenda. These are not the actions of a credible historian who approaches the past with a certain amount of objectivity and does not use it as a canvas to project his own warped vision of England having always been a multiracial or multicultural society and then proceeds to call these hordes of negroid and asiatic immigrants as being "English". That they are not and never can be!
Anyone caring to research MaCulloch further will note his open homosexuality and apparent membership of the Gay Christian Movement in 1976 and his ordination as a Deacon in the Church of England in 1987.